FFMGF
Price
$0.14
Change
+$0.01 (+7.69%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
103.03M
TDRRF
Price
$0.40
Change
-$0.01 (-2.44%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
197.86M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FFMGF vs TDRRF

Header iconFFMGF vs TDRRF Comparison
Open Charts FFMGF vs TDRRFBanner chart's image
First Mining Gold
Price$0.14
Change+$0.01 (+7.69%)
Volume$848.04K
Capitalization103.03M
TUDOR GOLD CORP NEW
Price$0.40
Change-$0.01 (-2.44%)
Volume$112.45K
Capitalization197.86M
FFMGF vs TDRRF Comparison Chart
Loading...
FFMGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TDRRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FFMGF vs. TDRRF commentary
Jun 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFMGF is a Hold and TDRRF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 08, 2025
Stock price -- (FFMGF: $0.12 vs. TDRRF: $0.36)
Brand notoriety: FFMGF and TDRRF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FFMGF: 40% vs. TDRRF: 312%
Market capitalization -- FFMGF: $103.03M vs. TDRRF: $197.86M
FFMGF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $103.03M. TDRRF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $197.86M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FFMGF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTDRRF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FFMGF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TDRRF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FFMGF is a better buy in the long-term than TDRRF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FFMGF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TDRRF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FFMGF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • TDRRF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FFMGF is a better buy in the short-term than TDRRF.

Price Growth

FFMGF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -1.89% price change this week, while TDRRF (@Precious Metals) price change was -10.97% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +6.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.90%, and the average quarterly price growth was +46.01%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+6.50% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TDRRF($198M) has a higher market cap than FFMGF($103M). FFMGF YTD gains are higher at: 38.710 vs. TDRRF (-21.412). TDRRF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -2.68M vs. FFMGF (-7.24M). FFMGF has more cash in the bank: 14.5M vs. TDRRF (2.19M). FFMGF has less debt than TDRRF: FFMGF (281K) vs TDRRF (1.86M). FFMGF (0) and TDRRF (0) have equivalent revenues.
FFMGFTDRRFFFMGF / TDRRF
Capitalization103M198M52%
EBITDA-7.24M-2.68M270%
Gain YTD38.710-21.412-181%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash14.5M2.19M663%
Total Debt281K1.86M15%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FFMGF vs TDRRF: Fundamental Ratings
FFMGF
TDRRF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
213
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
30
Undervalued
33
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9492
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4683
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FFMGF's Valuation (30) in the null industry is in the same range as TDRRF (33). This means that FFMGF’s stock grew similarly to TDRRF’s over the last 12 months.

FFMGF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as TDRRF (100). This means that FFMGF’s stock grew similarly to TDRRF’s over the last 12 months.

TDRRF's SMR Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as FFMGF (94). This means that TDRRF’s stock grew similarly to FFMGF’s over the last 12 months.

FFMGF's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TDRRF (83). This means that FFMGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than TDRRF’s over the last 12 months.

FFMGF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as TDRRF (100). This means that FFMGF’s stock grew similarly to TDRRF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FFMGFTDRRF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
86%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
87%
Bearish Trend 25 days ago
88%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
89%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FFMGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TDRRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL200.420.21
+0.10%
Apple
SPY587.73-3.42
-0.58%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
BTC.X107802.330000-1192.312500
-1.09%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA356.90-5.99
-1.65%
Tesla
GME31.21-3.80
-10.85%
GameStop Corp

FFMGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FFMGF has been loosely correlated with SLVRF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FFMGF jumps, then SLVRF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FFMGF
1D Price
Change %
FFMGF100%
+0.96%
SLVRF - FFMGF
36%
Loosely correlated
+1.41%
CXBMF - FFMGF
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.43%
ISVLF - FFMGF
35%
Loosely correlated
+5.59%
SSVRF - FFMGF
34%
Loosely correlated
-0.51%
BKRRF - FFMGF
34%
Loosely correlated
-0.42%
More

TDRRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TDRRF and SLVRF have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TDRRF and SLVRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TDRRF
1D Price
Change %
TDRRF100%
-10.06%
SLVRF - TDRRF
32%
Poorly correlated
+1.41%
SSVRF - TDRRF
31%
Poorly correlated
-0.51%
RSNVF - TDRRF
28%
Poorly correlated
+7.94%
FFMGF - TDRRF
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.96%
ISVLF - TDRRF
26%
Poorly correlated
+5.59%
More