FFMGF
Price
$0.13
Change
+$0.01 (+8.33%)
Updated
Aug 8 closing price
Capitalization
162.59M
TDRRF
Price
$0.46
Change
+$0.02 (+4.55%)
Updated
Aug 8 closing price
Capitalization
117.26M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FFMGF vs TDRRF

Header iconFFMGF vs TDRRF Comparison
Open Charts FFMGF vs TDRRFBanner chart's image
First Mining Gold
Price$0.13
Change+$0.01 (+8.33%)
Volume$434.42K
Capitalization162.59M
TUDOR GOLD CORP NEW
Price$0.46
Change+$0.02 (+4.55%)
Volume$80.6K
Capitalization117.26M
FFMGF vs TDRRF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FFMGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TDRRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FFMGF vs. TDRRF commentary
Aug 11, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFMGF is a Hold and TDRRF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 11, 2025
Stock price -- (FFMGF: $0.13 vs. TDRRF: $0.46)
Brand notoriety: FFMGF and TDRRF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FFMGF: 41% vs. TDRRF: 76%
Market capitalization -- FFMGF: $162.59M vs. TDRRF: $117.26M
FFMGF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $162.59M. TDRRF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $117.26M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $76.48B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $2.45B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FFMGF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTDRRF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FFMGF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TDRRF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FFMGF is a better buy in the long-term than TDRRF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FFMGF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TDRRF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FFMGF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • TDRRF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TDRRF is a better buy in the short-term than FFMGF.

Price Growth

FFMGF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +6.24% price change this week, while TDRRF (@Precious Metals) price change was +5.21% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +19.59%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.14%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4669.57%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+19.59% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFMGF($163M) has a higher market cap than TDRRF($117M). FFMGF YTD gains are higher at: 52.449 vs. TDRRF (-1.194). TDRRF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -4.41M vs. FFMGF (-7.17M). FFMGF has more cash in the bank: 11.7M vs. TDRRF (242K). FFMGF has less debt than TDRRF: FFMGF (212K) vs TDRRF (239K). FFMGF (0) and TDRRF (0) have equivalent revenues.
FFMGFTDRRFFFMGF / TDRRF
Capitalization163M117M139%
EBITDA-7.17M-4.41M162%
Gain YTD52.449-1.194-4,391%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash11.7M242K4,835%
Total Debt212K239K89%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FFMGF vs TDRRF: Fundamental Ratings
FFMGF
TDRRF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
33
Fair valued
37
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9393
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4652
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a45

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FFMGF's Valuation (33) in the null industry is in the same range as TDRRF (37). This means that FFMGF’s stock grew similarly to TDRRF’s over the last 12 months.

FFMGF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as TDRRF (100). This means that FFMGF’s stock grew similarly to TDRRF’s over the last 12 months.

FFMGF's SMR Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as TDRRF (93). This means that FFMGF’s stock grew similarly to TDRRF’s over the last 12 months.

FFMGF's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as TDRRF (52). This means that FFMGF’s stock grew similarly to TDRRF’s over the last 12 months.

FFMGF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as TDRRF (100). This means that FFMGF’s stock grew similarly to TDRRF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FFMGFTDRRF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
89%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
88%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
89%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FFMGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TDRRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FCUIX20.140.12
+0.60%
NYLI PineStone U.S. Equity Class I
CPAYX11.160.05
+0.45%
Integrity Dividend Summit C
ALGCX17.40-0.02
-0.11%
Alger International Opportunities C
POSIX9.66-0.04
-0.41%
Principal Global Real Estate Sec Instl
DEMIX25.80-0.22
-0.85%
Macquarie Emerging Markets Instl

FFMGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FFMGF and BCEKF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FFMGF and BCEKF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FFMGF
1D Price
Change %
FFMGF100%
+5.00%
BCEKF - FFMGF
28%
Poorly correlated
+1.27%
TORXF - FFMGF
27%
Poorly correlated
-1.19%
TDRRF - FFMGF
26%
Poorly correlated
+2.94%
ELEMF - FFMGF
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.41%
ORZCF - FFMGF
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.86%
More

TDRRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TDRRF and FFMGF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TDRRF and FFMGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TDRRF
1D Price
Change %
TDRRF100%
+2.94%
FFMGF - TDRRF
26%
Poorly correlated
+5.00%
CGLCF - TDRRF
25%
Poorly correlated
+4.31%
LGDTF - TDRRF
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.75%
MMRGF - TDRRF
23%
Poorly correlated
-2.51%
RDGMF - TDRRF
23%
Poorly correlated
-4.79%
More