FFMGF
Price
$0.16
Change
+$0.01 (+6.67%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
204.55M
FMANF
Price
$0.13
Change
-$0.01 (-7.14%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
32.96M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FFMGF vs FMANF

Header iconFFMGF vs FMANF Comparison
Open Charts FFMGF vs FMANFBanner chart's image
First Mining Gold
Price$0.16
Change+$0.01 (+6.67%)
Volume$1.65M
Capitalization204.55M
Freeman Gold
Price$0.13
Change-$0.01 (-7.14%)
Volume$66.55K
Capitalization32.96M
FFMGF vs FMANF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FFMGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FMANF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FFMGF vs. FMANF commentary
Sep 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFMGF is a Buy and FMANF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 04, 2025
Stock price -- (FFMGF: $0.16 vs. FMANF: $0.13)
Brand notoriety: FFMGF and FMANF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FFMGF: 159% vs. FMANF: 21%
Market capitalization -- FFMGF: $204.55M vs. FMANF: $32.96M
FFMGF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $204.55M. FMANF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $32.96M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $93.2B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $2.78B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FFMGF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFMANF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FFMGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FMANF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FFMGF is a better buy in the long-term than FMANF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FFMGF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FMANF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FFMGF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FMANF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FFMGF is a better buy in the short-term than FMANF.

Price Growth

FFMGF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +15.49% price change this week, while FMANF (@Precious Metals) price change was -3.46% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +5.67%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +15.85%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4955.93%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+5.67% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFMGF($205M) has a higher market cap than FMANF($33M). FMANF YTD gains are higher at: 163.780 vs. FFMGF (86.410). FMANF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -452.11K vs. FFMGF (-7.68M). FFMGF has more cash in the bank: 5.78M vs. FMANF (2.67M). FMANF has less debt than FFMGF: FMANF (0) vs FFMGF (210K). FFMGF (0) and FMANF (0) have equivalent revenues.
FFMGFFMANFFFMGF / FMANF
Capitalization205M33M621%
EBITDA-7.68M-452.11K1,699%
Gain YTD86.410163.78053%
P/E RatioN/A38.22-
Revenue00-
Total Cash5.78M2.67M217%
Total Debt210K0-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FFMGF: Fundamental Ratings
FFMGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
20
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
35
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
93
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
38
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FFMGFFMANF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 29 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FFMGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FMANF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CGRIX78.280.63
+0.81%
Calamos Growth I
HFQIX6.98N/A
N/A
Janus Henderson Global Equity Income I
SCVJX37.45-0.04
-0.11%
Allspring Small Company Value R6
IGNCX14.01-0.02
-0.14%
Macquarie Natural Resources C
NEQIX12.83-0.04
-0.31%
Neuberger Berman U.S. Equity Impact I

FFMGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FFMGF and BCEKF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FFMGF and BCEKF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FFMGF
1D Price
Change %
FFMGF100%
+2.04%
BCEKF - FFMGF
28%
Poorly correlated
+6.46%
TORXF - FFMGF
27%
Poorly correlated
-2.31%
TDRRF - FFMGF
26%
Poorly correlated
+10.73%
ELEMF - FFMGF
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.07%
ORZCF - FFMGF
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.13%
More

FMANF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FMANF and VIORF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FMANF and VIORF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FMANF
1D Price
Change %
FMANF100%
-2.01%
VIORF - FMANF
26%
Poorly correlated
+16.57%
FFMGF - FMANF
5%
Poorly correlated
+2.04%
EQTRF - FMANF
1%
Poorly correlated
+15.26%
EREPF - FMANF
-8%
Poorly correlated
N/A