Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFLV vs SCHD
FFLV vs SCHD Comparison
Open Charts FFLV vs SCHD
Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Value ETF
Price$23.11
Change+$0.20 (+0.87%)
Volume$1.2K
Net Assets10.96M
Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF™
Price$27.21
Change+$0.22 (+0.82%)
Volume$16.48M
Net Assets71.22B
FFLV vs SCHD Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFLV vs. SCHD commentary
Sep 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFLV is a Hold and SCHD is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCHD has more net assets: 71.2B vs. FFLV (11M). FFLV has a higher annual dividend yield than SCHD: FFLV (9.364) vs SCHD (2.457). FFLV was incepted earlier than SCHD: FFLV (2 years) vs SCHD (14 years). SCHD (0.06) has a lower expense ratio than FFLV (0.38). FFLV (29.00) and SCHD (29.00) have matching turnover.
| FFLV | SCHD | FFLV / SCHD | |
| Gain YTD | 9.364 | 2.457 | 381% |
| Net Assets | 11M | 71.2B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.38 | 0.06 | 633% |
| Turnover | 29.00 | 29.00 | 100% |
| Yield | 1.66 | 3.67 | 45% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 14 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FFLV | SCHD | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 30% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 69% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 72% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 5 days ago 70% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 78% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 71% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FFLV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FFLV has been loosely correlated with WSC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FFLV jumps, then WSC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FFLV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FFLV | 100% | +0.88% | ||
| WSC - FFLV | 42% Loosely correlated | -1.30% | ||
| GTM - FFLV | 35% Loosely correlated | +1.85% | ||
| LMT - FFLV | 10% Poorly correlated | +0.64% | ||
| NOC - FFLV | 10% Poorly correlated | +1.49% | ||
| SNY - FFLV | 7% Poorly correlated | +1.04% | ||
More | ||||
SCHD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHD has been closely correlated with FITB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SCHD jumps, then FITB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCHD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHD | 100% | +0.82% | ||
| FITB - SCHD | 75% Closely correlated | +0.33% | ||
| TROW - SCHD | 74% Closely correlated | +0.25% | ||
| USB - SCHD | 74% Closely correlated | +0.84% | ||
| APAM - SCHD | 73% Closely correlated | +0.21% | ||
| RF - SCHD | 73% Closely correlated | +0.11% | ||
More | ||||