Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFLV vs SCHD
FFLV vs SCHD Comparison
Open Charts FFLV vs SCHD
Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Value ETF
Price$25.99
Change+$0.19 (+0.74%)
Volume$100
Net Assets16.12M
Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF™
Price$31.00
Change+$0.50 (+1.64%)
Volume$142.31K
Net Assets80.31B
FFLV vs SCHD Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFLV vs. SCHD commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFLV is a Buy and SCHD is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCHD has more net assets: 80.3B vs. FFLV (16.1M). SCHD has a higher annual dividend yield than FFLV: SCHD (11.192) vs FFLV (5.622). FFLV was incepted earlier than SCHD: FFLV (2 years) vs SCHD (14 years). SCHD (0.06) has a lower expense ratio than FFLV (0.38). FFLV has a higher turnover SCHD (30.00) vs SCHD (30.00).
| FFLV | SCHD | FFLV / SCHD | |
| Gain YTD | 5.622 | 11.192 | 50% |
| Net Assets | 16.1M | 80.3B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.38 | 0.06 | 633% |
| Turnover | 44.00 | 30.00 | 147% |
| Yield | 1.54 | 3.51 | 44% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 14 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FFLV | SCHD | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 67% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 84% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 72% | 16 days ago 70% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
FFLV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FFLV has been loosely correlated with WSC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FFLV jumps, then WSC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FFLV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FFLV | 100% | +0.62% | ||
| WSC - FFLV | 50% Loosely correlated | -0.65% | ||
| CTRI - FFLV | 46% Loosely correlated | +2.59% | ||
| GTM - FFLV | 42% Loosely correlated | -11.40% | ||
| UNH - FFLV | 17% Poorly correlated | -0.49% | ||
| ORI - FFLV | 15% Poorly correlated | +2.50% | ||
More | ||||
SCHD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHD has been closely correlated with FITB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SCHD jumps, then FITB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCHD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHD | 100% | +1.67% | ||
| FITB - SCHD | 74% Closely correlated | +1.54% | ||
| BEN - SCHD | 73% Closely correlated | -0.26% | ||
| USB - SCHD | 73% Closely correlated | +2.32% | ||
| TROW - SCHD | 73% Closely correlated | -3.74% | ||
| RF - SCHD | 73% Closely correlated | +2.44% | ||
More | ||||