Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFLV vs SCHD
FFLV vs SCHD Comparison
Open Charts FFLV vs SCHD
Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Value ETF
Price$22.22
Change-$0.04 (-0.18%)
Volume$1.98K
Net Assets10.54M
Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF™
Price$27.02
Change-$0.12 (-0.44%)
Volume$13.2M
Net Assets70.59B
FFLV vs SCHD Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFLV vs. SCHD commentary
Jul 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFLV is a Hold and SCHD is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCHD has more net assets: 70.6B vs. FFLV (10.5M). FFLV has a higher annual dividend yield than SCHD: FFLV (4.718) vs SCHD (0.774). FFLV was incepted earlier than SCHD: FFLV (1 year) vs SCHD (14 years). SCHD (0.06) has a lower expense ratio than FFLV (0.38). FFLV (29.00) and SCHD (29.00) have matching turnover.
| FFLV | SCHD | FFLV / SCHD | |
| Gain YTD | 4.718 | 0.774 | 609% |
| Net Assets | 10.5M | 70.6B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.38 | 0.06 | 633% |
| Turnover | 29.00 | 29.00 | 100% |
| Yield | 1.73 | 3.87 | 45% |
| Fund Existence | 1 year | 14 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FFLV | SCHD | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 72% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 71% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 60% | 3 days ago 73% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 58% | 3 days ago 75% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 70% | 3 days ago 73% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | 4 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 6 days ago 71% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 64% | 3 days ago 72% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FFLV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FFLV has been closely correlated with APO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FFLV jumps, then APO could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FFLV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FFLV | 100% | -0.19% | ||
| APO - FFLV | 77% Closely correlated | -2.60% | ||
| OMF - FFLV | 77% Closely correlated | +0.47% | ||
| BLK - FFLV | 77% Closely correlated | -0.16% | ||
| EWBC - FFLV | 76% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| BAC - FFLV | 75% Closely correlated | +0.64% | ||
More | ||||
SCHD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHD has been closely correlated with APAM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SCHD jumps, then APAM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCHD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHD | 100% | -0.44% | ||
| APAM - SCHD | 75% Closely correlated | -0.90% | ||
| HBAN - SCHD | 74% Closely correlated | -1.59% | ||
| BLK - SCHD | 74% Closely correlated | -0.16% | ||
| COLB - SCHD | 71% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| USB - SCHD | 71% Closely correlated | +1.06% | ||
More | ||||