Intraday BUY SELL Signals
32 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFLV vs NOC
FFLV vs NOC Comparison
Open Charts FFLV vs NOC
Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Value ETF
Price$24.67
Change-$0.03 (-0.12%)
Volume$6.87K
Net Assets12.32M
Northrop Grumman
Price$577.46
Change-$4.89 (-0.84%)
Volume$2.49K
Capitalization83.11B
FFLV vs NOC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFLV vs. NOC commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFLV is a Buy and NOC is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NOC: Fundamental Ratings
NOC | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 24 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 20 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 14 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 36 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 49 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 82 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FFLV | NOC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 70% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 53% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 47% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 46% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 55% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 52% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 5 days ago 58% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 75% | 9 days ago 43% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 67% | 3 days ago 54% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 41% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
FFLV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FFLV has been loosely correlated with WSC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FFLV jumps, then WSC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FFLV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FFLV | 100% | +0.43% | ||
| WSC - FFLV | 50% Loosely correlated | +0.31% | ||
| CTRI - FFLV | 45% Loosely correlated | -0.08% | ||
| GTM - FFLV | 42% Loosely correlated | +0.50% | ||
| NOC - FFLV | 18% Poorly correlated | +0.39% | ||
| APO - FFLV | 14% Poorly correlated | +0.32% | ||
More | ||||
NOC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NOC has been loosely correlated with RTX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NOC jumps, then RTX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y