Intraday BUY SELL Signals
56 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFLS vs MU
FFLS vs MU Comparison
Open Charts FFLS vs MU
Future Fund Long/Short ETF
Price$23.11
Change-$1.82 (-7.30%)
Volume$7.81K
Net Assets39.59M
Micron Technology
Price$419.44
Change+$227.11 (+118.08%)
Volume$42.76M
Capitalization472.08B
FFLS vs MU Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFLS vs. MU commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFLS is a Hold and MU is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MU: Fundamental Ratings
MU | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 21 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 63 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 7 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 41 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 1 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 15 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FFLS | MU | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 72% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 76% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 57% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 56% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 56% | 1 day ago 75% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 59% | 1 day ago 74% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 78% | 7 days ago 73% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 53% | 22 days ago 72% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 1 day ago 70% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 55% | 1 day ago 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
FFLS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FFLS has been loosely correlated with META. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FFLS jumps, then META could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FFLS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FFLS | 100% | -0.86% | ||
| META - FFLS | 61% Loosely correlated | -2.08% | ||
| NVDA - FFLS | 60% Loosely correlated | -2.84% | ||
| GTLB - FFLS | 54% Loosely correlated | -7.10% | ||
| MU - FFLS | 54% Loosely correlated | -4.19% | ||
| DASH - FFLS | 53% Loosely correlated | -2.73% | ||
More | ||||
MU and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MU has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MU jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y