16 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFLS vs MU
FFLS vs MU Comparison
Open Charts FFLS vs MU
Future Fund Long/Short ETF
Price$25.76
Change+$0.16 (+0.62%)
Volume$3.09K
Net Assets40.71M
Micron Technology
Price$131.37
Change+$7.16 (+5.76%)
Volume$28.42M
Capitalization147.02B
FFLS vs MU Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFLS vs. MU commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFLS is a Buy and MU is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MU: Fundamental Ratings
MU | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 32 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 28 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 46 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 60 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 5 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FFLS | MU | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 64% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 47% | 3 days ago 67% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 77% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 71% | 3 days ago 74% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 75% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 73% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 72% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 52% | 6 days ago 72% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 55% | 3 days ago 60% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FFLS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FFLS has been loosely correlated with NVDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FFLS jumps, then NVDA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FFLS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FFLS | 100% | +0.60% | ||
| NVDA - FFLS | 65% Loosely correlated | -2.70% | ||
| DASH - FFLS | 56% Loosely correlated | -0.78% | ||
| MU - FFLS | 55% Loosely correlated | +5.76% | ||
| CRM - FFLS | 54% Loosely correlated | +2.77% | ||
| DELL - FFLS | 54% Loosely correlated | -1.45% | ||
More | ||||
MU and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MU has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MU jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y