Intraday BUY SELL Signals
76 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFLS vs MU
FFLS vs MU Comparison
Open Charts FFLS vs MU
Future Fund Long/Short ETF
Price$23.76
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$114
Net Assets39.88M
Micron Technology
Price$333.34
Change-$4.79 (-1.42%)
Volume$161.93K
Capitalization375.19B
FFLS vs MU Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFLS vs. MU commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFLS is a Hold and MU is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MU: Fundamental Ratings
MU | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 71 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 54 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 11 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 41 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 1 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 35 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FFLS | MU | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 50% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 73% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 73% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 72% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 73% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | 7 days ago 72% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 72% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
FFLS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FFLS has been loosely correlated with NVDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FFLS jumps, then NVDA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FFLS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FFLS | 100% | -0.73% | ||
| NVDA - FFLS | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.47% | ||
| META - FFLS | 61% Loosely correlated | -1.69% | ||
| GTLB - FFLS | 57% Loosely correlated | +0.53% | ||
| CRM - FFLS | 55% Loosely correlated | -7.07% | ||
| MU - FFLS | 54% Loosely correlated | -2.24% | ||
More | ||||
MU and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MU has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MU jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y