Intraday BUY SELL Signals
5 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFLS vs MU
FFLS vs MU Comparison
Open Charts FFLS vs MU
Future Fund Long/Short ETF
Price$24.44
Change-$0.17 (-0.69%)
Volume$4.5K
Net Assets40.38M
Micron Technology
Price$242.64
Change-$15.82 (-6.12%)
Volume$9.72K
Capitalization290.86B
FFLS vs MU Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFLS vs. MU commentary
Dec 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFLS is a Hold and MU is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MU: Fundamental Ratings
MU | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 14 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 44 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 18 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 2 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 99 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 90 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FFLS | MU | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 77% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 72% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | 2 days ago 76% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 75% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 73% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 53% | 9 days ago 71% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 78% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
FFLS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FFLS has been loosely correlated with NVDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FFLS jumps, then NVDA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FFLS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FFLS | 100% | -0.70% | ||
| NVDA - FFLS | 61% Loosely correlated | -1.55% | ||
| META - FFLS | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.40% | ||
| GTLB - FFLS | 57% Loosely correlated | +0.49% | ||
| CRM - FFLS | 55% Loosely correlated | -0.70% | ||
| MU - FFLS | 54% Loosely correlated | -1.99% | ||
More | ||||
MU and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MU has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MU jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y