Intraday BUY SELL Signals
84 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFLS vs META
FFLS vs META Comparison
Open Charts FFLS vs META
Future Fund Long/Short ETF
Price$23.21
Change+$0.10 (+0.43%)
Volume$1.6K
Net Assets39.59M
Meta Platforms
Price$668.66
Change-$23.04 (-3.33%)
Volume$184.43K
Capitalization1.75T
FFLS vs META Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFLS vs. META commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFLS is a Hold and META is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
META: Fundamental Ratings
META | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 8 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 27 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 35 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 29 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 52 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 51 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FFLS | META | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 53% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 60% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 70% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 71% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 78% | 9 days ago 75% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 53% | 2 days ago 52% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 60% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 76% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
FFLS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FFLS has been loosely correlated with META. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FFLS jumps, then META could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FFLS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FFLS | 100% | -0.86% | ||
| META - FFLS | 61% Loosely correlated | -2.08% | ||
| NVDA - FFLS | 60% Loosely correlated | -2.84% | ||
| GTLB - FFLS | 54% Loosely correlated | -7.10% | ||
| MU - FFLS | 54% Loosely correlated | -4.19% | ||
| DASH - FFLS | 53% Loosely correlated | -2.73% | ||
More | ||||
META and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, META has been loosely correlated with DASH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if META jumps, then DASH could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To META | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| META | 100% | -2.08% | ||
| DASH - META | 58% Loosely correlated | -2.73% | ||
| THRY - META | 55% Loosely correlated | -5.74% | ||
| RDDT - META | 53% Loosely correlated | -6.63% | ||
| GOOGL - META | 51% Loosely correlated | -1.16% | ||
| OPRA - META | 48% Loosely correlated | -6.45% | ||
More | ||||