Intraday BUY SELL Signals
20 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFLS vs META
FFLS vs META Comparison
Open Charts FFLS vs META
Future Fund Long/Short ETF
Price$23.76
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$5.23K
Net Assets39.94M
Meta Platforms
Price$618.32
Change+$2.80 (+0.45%)
Volume$28.6K
Capitalization1.55T
FFLS vs META Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFLS vs. META commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFLS is a Hold and META is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
META: Fundamental Ratings
META | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 66 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 26 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 41 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 29 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 61 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 56 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FFLS | META | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 60% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 51% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 60% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 68% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 79% | 23 days ago 75% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 54% | 2 days ago 52% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 73% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
FFLS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FFLS has been loosely correlated with NVDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FFLS jumps, then NVDA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FFLS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FFLS | 100% | +0.01% | ||
| NVDA - FFLS | 61% Loosely correlated | -1.44% | ||
| META - FFLS | 61% Loosely correlated | -2.47% | ||
| GTLB - FFLS | 57% Loosely correlated | +0.86% | ||
| CRM - FFLS | 55% Loosely correlated | -0.62% | ||
| MU - FFLS | 54% Loosely correlated | -1.41% | ||
More | ||||
META and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, META has been loosely correlated with DASH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if META jumps, then DASH could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To META | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| META | 100% | -2.47% | ||
| DASH - META | 58% Loosely correlated | -1.96% | ||
| RDDT - META | 57% Loosely correlated | -2.53% | ||
| THRY - META | 55% Loosely correlated | +3.20% | ||
| OPRA - META | 50% Loosely correlated | -0.15% | ||
| TWLO - META | 47% Loosely correlated | -5.24% | ||
More | ||||