Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFLS vs LSEQ
FFLS vs LSEQ Comparison
Open Charts FFLS vs LSEQ
Future Fund Long/Short ETF
Price$24.71
Change-$0.03 (-0.12%)
Volume$3.5K
Net Assets40.37M
Harbor Long-Short Equity ETF
Price$28.50
Change-$0.51 (-1.76%)
Volume$100
Net Assets20.17M
FFLS vs LSEQ Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFLS vs. LSEQ commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFLS is a Buy and LSEQ is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFLS has more net assets: 40.4M vs. LSEQ (20.2M). FFLS has a higher annual dividend yield than LSEQ: FFLS (7.469) vs LSEQ (5.909). FFLS was incepted earlier than LSEQ: FFLS (2 years) vs LSEQ (2 years). FFLS (1.24) has a lower expense ratio than LSEQ (1.98). FFLS has a higher turnover LSEQ (194.00) vs LSEQ (194.00).
| FFLS | LSEQ | FFLS / LSEQ | |
| Gain YTD | 7.469 | 5.909 | 126% |
| Net Assets | 40.4M | 20.2M | 200% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 1.98 | 63% |
| Turnover | 313.00 | 194.00 | 161% |
| Yield | 0.16 | 0.00 | - |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FFLS | LSEQ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 61% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 53% | 2 days ago 74% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 21 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 53% | 23 days ago 58% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 60% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
FFLS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FFLS has been loosely correlated with NVDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FFLS jumps, then NVDA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FFLS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FFLS | 100% | -0.57% | ||
| NVDA - FFLS | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.33% | ||
| META - FFLS | 61% Loosely correlated | -2.88% | ||
| GTLB - FFLS | 57% Loosely correlated | -0.17% | ||
| CRM - FFLS | 55% Loosely correlated | +0.62% | ||
| MU - FFLS | 54% Loosely correlated | +1.57% | ||
More | ||||
LSEQ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that LSEQ and APP have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LSEQ and APP's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LSEQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LSEQ | 100% | +0.23% | ||
| APP - LSEQ | 20% Poorly correlated | -1.69% | ||
| BSX - LSEQ | 19% Poorly correlated | +1.59% | ||
| DGX - LSEQ | 19% Poorly correlated | -1.06% | ||
| ADSK - LSEQ | 17% Poorly correlated | -0.04% | ||
| COST - LSEQ | 15% Poorly correlated | +0.02% | ||
More | ||||