Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFLS vs LSEQ
FFLS vs LSEQ Comparison
Open Charts FFLS vs LSEQ
Future Fund Long/Short ETF
Price$25.62
Change+$0.09 (+0.35%)
Volume$2.11K
Net Assets41.02M
Harbor Long-Short Equity ETF
Price$27.64
Change-$0.14 (-0.50%)
Volume$468
Net Assets19.43M
FFLS vs LSEQ Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFLS vs. LSEQ commentary
Jul 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFLS is a Hold and LSEQ is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFLS has more net assets: 41M vs. LSEQ (19.4M). FFLS has a higher annual dividend yield than LSEQ: FFLS (10.904) vs LSEQ (0.912). FFLS was incepted earlier than LSEQ: FFLS (2 years) vs LSEQ (2 years). FFLS (1.24) has a lower expense ratio than LSEQ (1.98). LSEQ has a higher turnover FFLS (88.00) vs FFLS (88.00).
| FFLS | LSEQ | FFLS / LSEQ | |
| Gain YTD | 10.904 | 0.912 | 1,195% |
| Net Assets | 41M | 19.4M | 211% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 1.98 | 63% |
| Turnover | 88.00 | 194.00 | 45% |
| Yield | 0.16 | 0.00 | - |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FFLS | LSEQ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 5 days ago 67% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 71% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 67% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 64% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 5 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 54% | 12 days ago 53% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 66% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FFLS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FFLS has been closely correlated with NVDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FFLS jumps, then NVDA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FFLS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FFLS | 100% | +0.99% | ||
| NVDA - FFLS | 69% Closely correlated | -0.60% | ||
| MU - FFLS | 62% Loosely correlated | -1.01% | ||
| DELL - FFLS | 62% Loosely correlated | -1.74% | ||
| CRM - FFLS | 58% Loosely correlated | -0.04% | ||
| GTLS - FFLS | 57% Loosely correlated | -2.59% | ||
More | ||||
LSEQ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that LSEQ and NI have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LSEQ and NI's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LSEQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LSEQ | 100% | -0.51% | ||
| NI - LSEQ | 31% Poorly correlated | +3.73% | ||
| ECL - LSEQ | 31% Poorly correlated | -0.24% | ||
| WMB - LSEQ | 31% Poorly correlated | -2.81% | ||
| GDDY - LSEQ | 30% Poorly correlated | -0.14% | ||
| AM - LSEQ | 30% Poorly correlated | -4.23% | ||
More | ||||