Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFLS vs LSEQ
FFLS vs LSEQ Comparison
Open Charts FFLS vs LSEQ
Future Fund Long/Short ETF
Price$23.17
Change+$0.06 (+0.26%)
Volume$100
Net Assets39.59M
Harbor Long-Short Equity ETF
Price$30.98
Change-$0.68 (-2.15%)
Volume$4.56K
Net Assets15.03M
FFLS vs LSEQ Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFLS vs. LSEQ commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFLS is a Hold and LSEQ is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFLS has more net assets: 39.6M vs. LSEQ (15M). LSEQ has a higher annual dividend yield than FFLS: LSEQ (14.790) vs FFLS (-0.451). FFLS was incepted earlier than LSEQ: FFLS (3 years) vs LSEQ (2 years). FFLS (1.24) has a lower expense ratio than LSEQ (1.98). FFLS (313.00) and LSEQ (308.00) have matching turnover.
| FFLS | LSEQ | FFLS / LSEQ | |
| Gain YTD | -0.451 | 14.790 | -3% |
| Net Assets | 39.6M | 15M | 264% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 1.98 | 63% |
| Turnover | 313.00 | 308.00 | 102% |
| Yield | 0.12 | 2.01 | 6% |
| Fund Existence | 3 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FFLS | LSEQ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 72% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 63% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 53% | 28 days ago 57% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 62% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
FFLS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FFLS has been loosely correlated with META. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FFLS jumps, then META could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FFLS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FFLS | 100% | -0.86% | ||
| META - FFLS | 61% Loosely correlated | -2.08% | ||
| NVDA - FFLS | 60% Loosely correlated | -2.84% | ||
| GTLB - FFLS | 54% Loosely correlated | -7.10% | ||
| MU - FFLS | 54% Loosely correlated | -4.19% | ||
| DASH - FFLS | 53% Loosely correlated | -2.73% | ||
More | ||||
LSEQ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that LSEQ and USFD have been poorly correlated (+18% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LSEQ and USFD's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LSEQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LSEQ | 100% | +3.27% | ||
| USFD - LSEQ | 18% Poorly correlated | +4.18% | ||
| DGX - LSEQ | 17% Poorly correlated | +0.09% | ||
| COST - LSEQ | 15% Poorly correlated | +0.99% | ||
| AA - LSEQ | 14% Poorly correlated | +5.39% | ||
| UHS - LSEQ | 14% Poorly correlated | +2.54% | ||
More | ||||