Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFLS vs LSEQ
FFLS vs LSEQ Comparison
Open Charts FFLS vs LSEQ
Future Fund Long/Short ETF
Price$25.76
Change+$0.16 (+0.62%)
Volume$3.09K
Net Assets41.48M
Harbor Long-Short Equity ETF
Price$27.65
Change+$0.16 (+0.58%)
Volume$375
Net Assets20.03M
FFLS vs LSEQ Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFLS vs. LSEQ commentary
Sep 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFLS is a Buy and LSEQ is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFLS has more net assets: 41.5M vs. LSEQ (20M). FFLS has a higher annual dividend yield than LSEQ: FFLS (11.888) vs LSEQ (0.953). FFLS was incepted earlier than LSEQ: FFLS (2 years) vs LSEQ (2 years). FFLS (1.24) has a lower expense ratio than LSEQ (1.98). LSEQ has a higher turnover FFLS (88.00) vs FFLS (88.00).
| FFLS | LSEQ | FFLS / LSEQ | |
| Gain YTD | 11.888 | 0.953 | 1,248% |
| Net Assets | 41.5M | 20M | 208% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 1.98 | 63% |
| Turnover | 88.00 | 194.00 | 45% |
| Yield | 0.16 | 0.00 | - |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FFLS | LSEQ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 47% | 1 day ago 68% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 70% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | 1 day ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 69% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 52% | 9 days ago 55% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 55% | 1 day ago 64% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 57% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FFLS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FFLS has been loosely correlated with NVDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FFLS jumps, then NVDA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FFLS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FFLS | 100% | +0.60% | ||
| NVDA - FFLS | 65% Loosely correlated | -2.70% | ||
| DASH - FFLS | 56% Loosely correlated | -0.78% | ||
| MU - FFLS | 55% Loosely correlated | +5.76% | ||
| CRM - FFLS | 54% Loosely correlated | +2.77% | ||
| DELL - FFLS | 54% Loosely correlated | -1.45% | ||
More | ||||
LSEQ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that LSEQ and ECL have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LSEQ and ECL's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LSEQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LSEQ | 100% | +0.57% | ||
| ECL - LSEQ | 32% Poorly correlated | -0.50% | ||
| CNP - LSEQ | 31% Poorly correlated | +0.85% | ||
| NI - LSEQ | 31% Poorly correlated | +1.26% | ||
| KMI - LSEQ | 30% Poorly correlated | -0.45% | ||
| WMB - LSEQ | 30% Poorly correlated | -0.66% | ||
More | ||||