Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFLS vs IDUB
FFLS vs IDUB Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFLS vs. IDUB commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFLS is a Hold and IDUB is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IDUB has more net assets: 425M vs. FFLS (39.6M). IDUB has a higher annual dividend yield than FFLS: IDUB (6.864) vs FFLS (-0.451). FFLS was incepted earlier than IDUB: FFLS (3 years) vs IDUB (5 years). IDUB (0.44) has a lower expense ratio than FFLS (1.24). FFLS has a higher turnover IDUB (10.00) vs IDUB (10.00).
| FFLS | IDUB | FFLS / IDUB | |
| Gain YTD | -0.451 | 6.864 | -7% |
| Net Assets | 39.6M | 425M | 9% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 0.44 | 282% |
| Turnover | 313.00 | 10.00 | 3,130% |
| Yield | 0.12 | 4.64 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 3 years | 5 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FFLS | IDUB | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 76% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 53% | 28 days ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
FFLS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FFLS has been loosely correlated with META. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FFLS jumps, then META could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FFLS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FFLS | 100% | -0.86% | ||
| META - FFLS | 61% Loosely correlated | -2.08% | ||
| NVDA - FFLS | 60% Loosely correlated | -2.84% | ||
| GTLB - FFLS | 54% Loosely correlated | -7.10% | ||
| MU - FFLS | 54% Loosely correlated | -4.19% | ||
| DASH - FFLS | 53% Loosely correlated | -2.73% | ||
More | ||||