73 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFLS vs GTLB
FFLS vs GTLB Comparison
Open Charts FFLS vs GTLB
Future Fund Long/Short ETF
Price$25.56
Change-$0.02 (-0.08%)
Volume$1K
Net Assets40.96M
GitLab
Price$47.48
Change+$0.76 (+1.63%)
Volume$26.86K
Capitalization7.79B
FFLS vs GTLB Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFLS vs. GTLB commentary
Sep 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFLS is a Hold and GTLB is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FFLS | GTLB | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 87% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 89% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 82% | 10 days ago 79% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 50% | 2 days ago 81% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 74% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| AAPU | 33.00 | 1.20 | +3.77% |
| Direxion Daily AAPL Bull 2X Shares | |||
| WXET | 16.92 | 0.32 | +1.90% |
| Teucrium 2x Daily Wheat ETF | |||
| USSH | 50.71 | -0.06 | -0.11% |
| WisdomTree 1-3 Year Laddered Trsy ETF | |||
| ILCV | 89.25 | -0.33 | -0.37% |
| iShares Morningstar Value ETF | |||
| RSEE | 32.60 | -0.22 | -0.67% |
| Rareview Systematic Equity ETF | |||
FFLS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FFLS has been loosely correlated with NVDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FFLS jumps, then NVDA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FFLS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FFLS | 100% | -0.10% | ||
| NVDA - FFLS | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.41% | ||
| GTLB - FFLS | 55% Loosely correlated | -1.08% | ||
| PANW - FFLS | 54% Loosely correlated | +0.75% | ||
| CRM - FFLS | 54% Loosely correlated | -2.01% | ||
| DASH - FFLS | 54% Loosely correlated | +0.51% | ||
More | ||||
GTLB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GTLB has been loosely correlated with PATH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GTLB jumps, then PATH could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GTLB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTLB | 100% | -1.08% | ||
| PATH - GTLB | 62% Loosely correlated | -1.46% | ||
| HUBS - GTLB | 61% Loosely correlated | -1.68% | ||
| ZS - GTLB | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.79% | ||
| TEAM - GTLB | 60% Loosely correlated | -0.86% | ||
| MDB - GTLB | 59% Loosely correlated | +0.01% | ||
More | ||||