Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFLS vs FTLS
FFLS vs FTLS Comparison
Open Charts FFLS vs FTLS
Future Fund Long/Short ETF
Price$23.17
Change+$0.06 (+0.26%)
Volume$100
Net Assets39.59M
First Trust Long/Short Equity ETF
Price$71.19
Change-$0.46 (-0.64%)
Volume$105
Net Assets2.18B
FFLS vs FTLS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFLS vs. FTLS commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFLS is a Hold and FTLS is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTLS has more net assets: 2.18B vs. FFLS (39.6M). FTLS has a higher annual dividend yield than FFLS: FTLS (0.930) vs FFLS (-0.451). FFLS was incepted earlier than FTLS: FFLS (3 years) vs FTLS (11 years). FFLS (1.24) has a lower expense ratio than FTLS (1.38). FFLS has a higher turnover FTLS (235.00) vs FTLS (235.00).
| FFLS | FTLS | FFLS / FTLS | |
| Gain YTD | -0.451 | 0.930 | -48% |
| Net Assets | 39.6M | 2.18B | 2% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 1.38 | 90% |
| Turnover | 313.00 | 235.00 | 133% |
| Yield | 0.12 | 1.06 | 12% |
| Fund Existence | 3 years | 11 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FFLS | FTLS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 60% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 84% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 66% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 78% | 9 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 53% | 22 days ago 64% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 72% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
FFLS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FFLS has been loosely correlated with META. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FFLS jumps, then META could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FFLS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FFLS | 100% | -0.86% | ||
| META - FFLS | 61% Loosely correlated | -2.08% | ||
| NVDA - FFLS | 60% Loosely correlated | -2.84% | ||
| GTLB - FFLS | 54% Loosely correlated | -7.10% | ||
| MU - FFLS | 54% Loosely correlated | -4.19% | ||
| DASH - FFLS | 53% Loosely correlated | -2.73% | ||
More | ||||
FTLS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FTLS has been closely correlated with SEIC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FTLS jumps, then SEIC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FTLS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FTLS | 100% | -0.64% | ||
| SEIC - FTLS | 74% Closely correlated | -5.14% | ||
| GS - FTLS | 73% Closely correlated | -0.78% | ||
| JHG - FTLS | 73% Closely correlated | -0.27% | ||
| MS - FTLS | 72% Closely correlated | -1.18% | ||
| SF - FTLS | 71% Closely correlated | +0.08% | ||
More | ||||