Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFLG vs SCHG
FFLG vs SCHG Comparison
Open Charts FFLG vs SCHG
Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Gr ETF
Price$26.76
Change+$0.26 (+0.98%)
Volume$53.53K
Net Assets447.49M
Schwab US Large-Cap Growth ETF™
Price$29.42
Change+$0.30 (+1.03%)
Volume$4.55M
Net Assets44.72B
FFLG vs SCHG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFLG vs. SCHG commentary
Jul 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFLG is a Hold and SCHG is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCHG has more net assets: 44.7B vs. FFLG (447M). FFLG has a higher annual dividend yield than SCHG: FFLG (6.771) vs SCHG (5.774). FFLG was incepted earlier than SCHG: FFLG (4 years) vs SCHG (16 years). SCHG (0.04) has a lower expense ratio than FFLG (0.38). FFLG has a higher turnover SCHG (3.00) vs SCHG (3.00).
| FFLG | SCHG | FFLG / SCHG | |
| Gain YTD | 6.771 | 5.774 | 117% |
| Net Assets | 447M | 44.7B | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.38 | 0.04 | 950% |
| Turnover | 52.00 | 3.00 | 1,733% |
| Yield | 0.12 | 0.39 | 30% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 16 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FFLG | SCHG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 77% | 4 days ago 75% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 77% | 4 days ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | 4 days ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 88% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 88% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 84% | 17 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 82% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 89% | 4 days ago 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FFLG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FFLG has been closely correlated with COHR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FFLG jumps, then COHR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FFLG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FFLG | 100% | +0.98% | ||
| COHR - FFLG | 80% Closely correlated | +2.87% | ||
| APO - FFLG | 76% Closely correlated | +1.18% | ||
| OWL - FFLG | 73% Closely correlated | +0.88% | ||
| HOOD - FFLG | 72% Closely correlated | -3.65% | ||
| AVGO - FFLG | 72% Closely correlated | +1.96% | ||
More | ||||
SCHG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHG has been closely correlated with MSFT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SCHG jumps, then MSFT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCHG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHG | 100% | +1.03% | ||
| MSFT - SCHG | 78% Closely correlated | +1.58% | ||
| META - SCHG | 78% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| LRCX - SCHG | 75% Closely correlated | -0.02% | ||
| CDNS - SCHG | 75% Closely correlated | +5.10% | ||
| APO - SCHG | 74% Closely correlated | +1.18% | ||
More | ||||