Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFLG vs SCHG
FFLG vs SCHG Comparison
Open Charts FFLG vs SCHG
Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Gr ETF
Price$29.59
Change-$0.74 (-2.44%)
Volume$345.65K
Net Assets530.43M
Schwab US Large-Cap Growth ETF™
Price$32.50
Change-$0.53 (-1.60%)
Volume$13.4M
Net Assets52.34B
FFLG vs SCHG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFLG vs. SCHG commentary
Dec 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFLG is a Buy and SCHG is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCHG has more net assets: 52.3B vs. FFLG (530M). FFLG has a higher annual dividend yield than SCHG: FFLG (21.003) vs SCHG (18.864). FFLG was incepted earlier than SCHG: FFLG (5 years) vs SCHG (16 years). SCHG (0.04) has a lower expense ratio than FFLG (0.38). FFLG has a higher turnover SCHG (27.00) vs SCHG (27.00).
| FFLG | SCHG | FFLG / SCHG | |
| Gain YTD | 21.003 | 18.864 | 111% |
| Net Assets | 530M | 52.3B | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.38 | 0.04 | 950% |
| Turnover | 52.00 | 27.00 | 193% |
| Yield | 0.18 | 0.36 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 16 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FFLG | SCHG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 77% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 87% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 86% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 88% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 26 days ago 84% | 26 days ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
FFLG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FFLG has been closely correlated with NVDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FFLG jumps, then NVDA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FFLG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FFLG | 100% | -0.40% | ||
| NVDA - FFLG | 83% Closely correlated | -1.55% | ||
| AMZN - FFLG | 80% Closely correlated | -0.65% | ||
| META - FFLG | 79% Closely correlated | +0.40% | ||
| ETN - FFLG | 77% Closely correlated | -0.87% | ||
| FLEX - FFLG | 76% Closely correlated | -1.48% | ||
More | ||||
SCHG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHG has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SCHG jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCHG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHG | 100% | +0.15% | ||
| AMZN - SCHG | 80% Closely correlated | -0.65% | ||
| NVDA - SCHG | 79% Closely correlated | -1.55% | ||
| PH - SCHG | 78% Closely correlated | +1.11% | ||
| MSFT - SCHG | 76% Closely correlated | +1.03% | ||
| LRCX - SCHG | 76% Closely correlated | +0.27% | ||
More | ||||