Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFLG vs IWF
FFLG vs IWF Comparison
Open Charts FFLG vs IWF
Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Gr ETF
Price$29.31
Change-$0.76 (-2.53%)
Volume$75.36K
Net Assets509.97M
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
Price$469.92
Change-$10.16 (-2.12%)
Volume$1.12M
Net Assets122.83B
FFLG vs IWF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFLG vs. IWF commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFLG is a Hold and IWF is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IWF has more net assets: 123B vs. FFLG (510M). FFLG (19.977) and IWF (19.903) have matching annual dividend yield . FFLG was incepted earlier than IWF: FFLG (5 years) vs IWF (25 years). IWF (0.18) has a lower expense ratio than FFLG (0.38). FFLG has a higher turnover IWF (13.00) vs IWF (13.00).
| FFLG | IWF | FFLG / IWF | |
| Gain YTD | 19.977 | 19.903 | 100% |
| Net Assets | 510M | 123B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.38 | 0.18 | 211% |
| Turnover | 52.00 | 13.00 | 400% |
| Yield | 0.18 | 0.34 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 25 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FFLG | IWF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 88% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 89% | 17 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
FFLG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FFLG has been closely correlated with NVDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FFLG jumps, then NVDA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FFLG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FFLG | 100% | -0.13% | ||
| NVDA - FFLG | 83% Closely correlated | +0.33% | ||
| AMZN - FFLG | 80% Closely correlated | -1.97% | ||
| META - FFLG | 79% Closely correlated | -2.88% | ||
| ETN - FFLG | 77% Closely correlated | +0.40% | ||
| FLEX - FFLG | 76% Closely correlated | +2.28% | ||
More | ||||
IWF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWF has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWF jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IWF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWF | 100% | -0.18% | ||
| CDNS - IWF | 79% Closely correlated | -0.93% | ||
| SNPS - IWF | 78% Closely correlated | +0.81% | ||
| MSFT - IWF | 77% Closely correlated | +0.48% | ||
| AMZN - IWF | 74% Closely correlated | -1.97% | ||
| KLAC - IWF | 73% Closely correlated | +0.68% | ||
More | ||||