Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFLDX vs NSFLX
FFLDX vs NSFLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFLDX vs. NSFLX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFLDX is a Hold and NSFLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFLDX has more cash in the bank: 17.1B vs. NSFLX (6.87M). FFLDX pays higher dividends than NSFLX: FFLDX (1.84) vs NSFLX (1.29). FFLDX was incepted earlier than NSFLX: FFLDX (10 years) vs NSFLX (8 years). NSFLX (1.43) is less costly to investors than FFLDX (0.08). NSFLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. FFLDX (12.00). NSFLX has a lower initial minimum investment than FFLDX: NSFLX (1000000) vs FFLDX (5000000). FFLDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.90 vs. NSFLX (-39.90). FFLDX return over 5 years is better than : 68.43 vs. NSFLX (-28.80).
| FFLDX | NSFLX | FFLDX / NSFLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.08 | 0.49 | 16% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.08 | 1.43 | 6% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.520 | -40.960 | -31% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 1000000 | 500% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 17.1B | 6.87M | 248,908% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.84 | 1.29 | 143% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.90 | -39.90 | -45% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.98 | -23.73 | -223% |
| Returns for 5 years | 68.43 | -28.80 | -238% |
| Returns for 10 years | 108.30 | N/A | - |