Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFLC vs SPY
FFLC vs SPY Comparison
Open Charts FFLC vs SPY
Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF
Price$54.35
Change-$0.31 (-0.57%)
Volume$53.67K
Net Assets987.28M
State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
Price$686.19
Change-$3.34 (-0.48%)
Volume$105.2M
Net Assets704.89B
FFLC vs SPY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFLC vs. SPY commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFLC is a Hold and SPY is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SPY has more net assets: 705B vs. FFLC (987M). FFLC has a higher annual dividend yield than SPY: FFLC (1.855) vs SPY (1.116). FFLC was incepted earlier than SPY: FFLC (6 years) vs SPY (33 years). SPY (0.09) has a lower expense ratio than FFLC (0.38). FFLC has a higher turnover SPY (3.00) vs SPY (3.00).
| FFLC | SPY | FFLC / SPY | |
| Gain YTD | 1.855 | 1.116 | 166% |
| Net Assets | 987M | 705B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.38 | 0.09 | 402% |
| Turnover | 46.00 | 3.00 | 1,533% |
| Yield | 1.07 | 1.05 | 102% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 33 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FFLC | SPY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 70% | 3 days ago 68% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 3 days ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 3 days ago 72% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 3 days ago 75% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 3 days ago 85% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 83% | 10 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% | 7 days ago 74% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 3 days ago 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
FFLC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FFLC has been closely correlated with PH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FFLC jumps, then PH could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FFLC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FFLC | 100% | -0.57% | ||
| PH - FFLC | 83% Closely correlated | +0.38% | ||
| MS - FFLC | 79% Closely correlated | -1.55% | ||
| APO - FFLC | 79% Closely correlated | +4.69% | ||
| APH - FFLC | 76% Closely correlated | -11.60% | ||
| AMZN - FFLC | 75% Closely correlated | -2.36% | ||
More | ||||
SPY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SPY has been loosely correlated with MSFT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SPY jumps, then MSFT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SPY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPY | 100% | -0.85% | ||
| MSFT - SPY | 63% Loosely correlated | -2.87% | ||
| AAPL - SPY | 62% Loosely correlated | -0.20% | ||
| AVGO - SPY | 62% Loosely correlated | -3.26% | ||
| AMZN - SPY | 60% Loosely correlated | -1.79% | ||
| META - SPY | 59% Loosely correlated | -2.08% | ||
More | ||||