Advertisement
FFIV vs NTAP
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFIV is a Hold and NTAP is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FFIV’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNTAP’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- FFIV’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- NTAP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FFIV’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NTAP’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- FFIV’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
- NTAP’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
FFIV (@Computer Communications) experienced а -2.56% price change this week, while NTAP (@Computer Communications) price change was -3.56% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was -1.70%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.74%, and the average quarterly price growth was +32.05%.
Reported Earning Dates
FFIV is expected to report earnings on Feb 02, 2026.
NTAP is expected to report earnings on Nov 25, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Computer Communications (-1.70% weekly)Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.
| FFIV | NTAP | FFIV / NTAP | |
| Capitalization | 13.9B | 22.3B | 62% |
| EBITDA | 853M | 1.7B | 50% |
| Gain YTD | -4.494 | -1.936 | 232% |
| P/E Ratio | 20.35 | 19.75 | 103% |
| Revenue | 3.03B | 6.59B | 46% |
| Total Cash | 1.43B | 3.32B | 43% |
| Total Debt | 260M | 2.75B | 9% |
FFIV | NTAP | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 60 | 61 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 69 Overvalued | 18 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 48 | 38 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 43 | 12 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 65 | 57 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 68 | 65 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | 44 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
NTAP's Valuation (18) in the Computer Peripherals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FFIV (69) in the Computer Communications industry. This means that NTAP’s stock grew somewhat faster than FFIV’s over the last 12 months.
NTAP's Profit vs Risk Rating (38) in the Computer Peripherals industry is in the same range as FFIV (48) in the Computer Communications industry. This means that NTAP’s stock grew similarly to FFIV’s over the last 12 months.
NTAP's SMR Rating (12) in the Computer Peripherals industry is in the same range as FFIV (43) in the Computer Communications industry. This means that NTAP’s stock grew similarly to FFIV’s over the last 12 months.
NTAP's Price Growth Rating (57) in the Computer Peripherals industry is in the same range as FFIV (65) in the Computer Communications industry. This means that NTAP’s stock grew similarly to FFIV’s over the last 12 months.
NTAP's P/E Growth Rating (65) in the Computer Peripherals industry is in the same range as FFIV (68) in the Computer Communications industry. This means that NTAP’s stock grew similarly to FFIV’s over the last 12 months.
| FFIV | NTAP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 53% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 47% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 51% | 2 days ago 54% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 51% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 64% | about 1 month ago 69% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 52% | 3 days ago 53% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 72% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 51% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| BUL | 53.83 | 0.44 | +0.82% |
| Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF | |||
| UMI | 49.93 | 0.07 | +0.15% |
| USCF Midstream Energy Income ETF | |||
| TOV | 28.80 | 0.01 | +0.03% |
| JLens 500 Jewish Advocacy U.S. ETF | |||
| QSML | 28.28 | N/A | N/A |
| WisdomTree U.S. Small Cap Quality Gr | |||
| PABU | 73.58 | -0.01 | -0.01% |
| iShares Paris-Algnd Clmt Optd MSCIUSAETF | |||
FFIV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FFIV has been loosely correlated with SHOP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FFIV jumps, then SHOP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FFIV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FFIV | 100% | +0.70% | ||
| SHOP - FFIV | 58% Loosely correlated | -1.48% | ||
| CPAY - FFIV | 57% Loosely correlated | -1.36% | ||
| ADSK - FFIV | 56% Loosely correlated | -0.04% | ||
| NTAP - FFIV | 56% Loosely correlated | +1.04% | ||
| CDNS - FFIV | 56% Loosely correlated | -0.93% | ||
More | ||||
NTAP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NTAP has been closely correlated with PSTG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NTAP jumps, then PSTG could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NTAP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NTAP | 100% | +1.04% | ||
| PSTG - NTAP | 73% Closely correlated | +1.27% | ||
| DELL - NTAP | 68% Closely correlated | +1.41% | ||
| HPQ - NTAP | 65% Loosely correlated | +1.94% | ||
| WDC - NTAP | 58% Loosely correlated | -2.28% | ||
| FFIV - NTAP | 55% Loosely correlated | +0.70% | ||
More | ||||