FFIV vs GAME
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFIV is a Buy and GAME is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FFIV’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGAME’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- FFIV’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- GAME’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FFIV’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GAME’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- FFIV’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
- GAME’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
FFIV (@Packaged Software) experienced а -6.21% price change this week, while GAME (@Packaged Software) price change was -23.45% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -3.37%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -11.18%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.22%.
Reported Earning Dates
FFIV is expected to report earnings on Apr 29, 2025.
GAME is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2023.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (-3.37% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| FFIV | GAME | FFIV / GAME | |
| Capitalization | 11.2B | 41.8M | 26,794% |
| EBITDA | 725M | -24.13M | -3,004% |
| Gain YTD | 5.977 | -24.499 | -24% |
| P/E Ratio | 24.75 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 2.81B | 39.9M | 7,030% |
| Total Cash | 826M | 2.45M | 33,756% |
| Total Debt | 276M | 10.5M | 2,629% |
FFIV | GAME | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 72 | 12 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 67 Overvalued | 23 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 23 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 40 | 78 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 36 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
GAME's Valuation (23) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FFIV (67) in the Computer Communications industry. This means that GAME’s stock grew somewhat faster than FFIV’s over the last 12 months.
FFIV's Profit vs Risk Rating (23) in the Computer Communications industry is significantly better than the same rating for GAME (100) in the null industry. This means that FFIV’s stock grew significantly faster than GAME’s over the last 12 months.
FFIV's SMR Rating (100) in the Computer Communications industry is in the same range as GAME (100) in the null industry. This means that FFIV’s stock grew similarly to GAME’s over the last 12 months.
FFIV's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Computer Communications industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GAME (78) in the null industry. This means that FFIV’s stock grew somewhat faster than GAME’s over the last 12 months.
FFIV's P/E Growth Rating (36) in the Computer Communications industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GAME (100) in the null industry. This means that FFIV’s stock grew somewhat faster than GAME’s over the last 12 months.
| FFIV | GAME | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 86% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 64% | 8 days ago 76% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 56% | 8 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 39% | 8 days ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 52% | 8 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 55% | 8 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 29 days ago 64% | 12 days ago 79% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 53% | 15 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 50% | 8 days ago 86% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 72% | 8 days ago 89% |
FFIV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FFIV has been loosely correlated with CVLT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FFIV jumps, then CVLT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FFIV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FFIV | 100% | -3.31% | ||
| CVLT - FFIV | 50% Loosely correlated | -3.75% | ||
| GEHC - FFIV | 45% Loosely correlated | -1.41% | ||
| TENB - FFIV | 45% Loosely correlated | -0.88% | ||
| VRNS - FFIV | 43% Loosely correlated | -1.79% | ||
| CDNS - FFIV | 41% Loosely correlated | -3.80% | ||
More | ||||
GAME and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that GAME and SNELF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GAME and SNELF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GAME | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GAME | 100% | -1.46% | ||
| SNELF - GAME | 30% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| DJCO - GAME | 24% Poorly correlated | -0.02% | ||
| SSTI - GAME | 22% Poorly correlated | -5.61% | ||
| MOGO - GAME | 22% Poorly correlated | -9.25% | ||
| PRVA - GAME | 21% Poorly correlated | -6.15% | ||
More | ||||