Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFIDX vs RGACX
FFIDX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts FFIDX vs RGACX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$83.62
Change+$0.46 (+0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets332.38B
FFIDX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFIDX vs. RGACX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFIDX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. FFIDX (8.74B). FFIDX pays higher dividends than RGACX: FFIDX (0.23) vs RGACX (0.07). FFIDX was incepted earlier than RGACX: FFIDX (95 years) vs RGACX (23 years). RGACX (0.94) is less costly to investors than FFIDX (0.43). FFIDX (25.00) and RGACX (25.00) have comparable annual turnover. FFIDX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: FFIDX (0) vs RGACX (250). FFIDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.58 vs. RGACX (17.83). FFIDX return over 5 years is better than : 81.62 vs. RGACX (40.02).
| FFIDX | RGACX | FFIDX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.43 | 0.94 | 46% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.43 | 0.94 | 46% |
| Fund Existence | 95 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.264 | 15.516 | 79% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.74B | 332B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.23 | 0.07 | 329% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.58 | 17.83 | 115% |
| Returns for 3 years | 77.91 | 58.53 | 133% |
| Returns for 5 years | 81.62 | 40.02 | 204% |
| Returns for 10 years | 165.20 | 95.93 | 172% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement