FFIC
Price
$16.93
Change
+$0.32 (+1.93%)
Updated
Dec 3, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
555.99M
50 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
WASH
Price
$29.59
Change
+$0.77 (+2.67%)
Updated
Dec 3 closing price
Capitalization
547.25M
55 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FFIC vs WASH

Header iconFFIC vs WASH Comparison
Open Charts FFIC vs WASHBanner chart's image
Flushing Financial
Price$16.93
Change+$0.32 (+1.93%)
Volume$3.1K
Capitalization555.99M
Washington Trust Ban
Price$29.59
Change+$0.77 (+2.67%)
Volume$125.2K
Capitalization547.25M
FFIC vs WASH Comparison Chart in %
FFIC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WASH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FFIC vs. WASH commentary
Dec 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFIC is a Hold and WASH is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 04, 2025
Stock price -- (FFIC: $16.60 vs. WASH: $28.80)
Brand notoriety: FFIC and WASH are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FFIC: 20% vs. WASH: 18%
Market capitalization -- FFIC: $555.99M vs. WASH: $547.25M
FFIC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $555.99M. WASH’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $547.25M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $172.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.26B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FFIC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWASH’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FFIC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WASH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FFIC is a better buy in the long-term than WASH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FFIC’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WASH’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FFIC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • WASH’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WASH is a better buy in the short-term than FFIC.

Price Growth

FFIC (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.53% price change this week, while WASH (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.65% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.92%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.89%.

Reported Earning Dates

FFIC is expected to report earnings on Jan 22, 2026.

WASH is expected to report earnings on Jan 28, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.92% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFIC($556M) and WASH($547M) have the same market capitalization . FFIC has higher P/E ratio than WASH: FFIC (16.09) vs WASH (12.16). FFIC YTD gains are higher at: 22.351 vs. WASH (-0.907). FFIC has less debt than WASH: FFIC (650M) vs WASH (1.06B). FFIC has higher revenues than WASH: FFIC (154M) vs WASH (111M).
FFICWASHFFIC / WASH
Capitalization556M547M102%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD22.351-0.907-2,465%
P/E Ratio16.0912.16132%
Revenue154M111M139%
Total CashN/A44M-
Total Debt650M1.06B61%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FFIC vs WASH: Fundamental Ratings
FFIC
WASH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
48
Fair valued
35
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6589
SMR RATING
1..100
4967
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4058
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2717
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
12n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WASH's Valuation (35) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FFIC (48). This means that WASH’s stock grew similarly to FFIC’s over the last 12 months.

FFIC's Profit vs Risk Rating (65) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as WASH (89). This means that FFIC’s stock grew similarly to WASH’s over the last 12 months.

FFIC's SMR Rating (49) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as WASH (67). This means that FFIC’s stock grew similarly to WASH’s over the last 12 months.

FFIC's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as WASH (58). This means that FFIC’s stock grew similarly to WASH’s over the last 12 months.

WASH's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FFIC (27). This means that WASH’s stock grew similarly to FFIC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FFICWASH
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
81%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
54%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
56%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
58%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
51%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FFIC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WASH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TRLIX25.41N/A
N/A
Nuveen Large Cap Value R6
LSVQX19.71N/A
N/A
LSV Small Cap Value Institutional
LHCSX23.04N/A
N/A
Lord Abbett Health Care R4
MAIJX20.74N/A
N/A
Morgan Stanley Inst Passport ovrs eq R6
VWYFX48.05N/A
N/A
Voya Small Cap Growth A

FFIC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FFIC has been closely correlated with STBA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FFIC jumps, then STBA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FFIC
1D Price
Change %
FFIC100%
+0.91%
STBA - FFIC
77%
Closely correlated
-0.03%
WASH - FFIC
77%
Closely correlated
+0.16%
TCBK - FFIC
76%
Closely correlated
+0.56%
STEL - FFIC
76%
Closely correlated
-1.02%
DCOM - FFIC
76%
Closely correlated
+0.83%
More

WASH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WASH has been closely correlated with STBA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WASH jumps, then STBA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WASH
1D Price
Change %
WASH100%
+0.16%
STBA - WASH
86%
Closely correlated
-0.03%
UBSI - WASH
85%
Closely correlated
-0.34%
WSFS - WASH
84%
Closely correlated
-1.37%
PEBO - WASH
84%
Closely correlated
-0.20%
HFWA - WASH
84%
Closely correlated
-0.46%
More