FFIC
Price
$12.60
Change
-$0.13 (-1.02%)
Updated
Jul 7, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
366.54M
17 days until earnings call
NASB
Price
$33.32
Change
+$0.04 (+0.12%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
215.55M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FFIC vs NASB

Header iconFFIC vs NASB Comparison
Open Charts FFIC vs NASBBanner chart's image
Flushing Financial
Price$12.60
Change-$0.13 (-1.02%)
Volume$1.35K
Capitalization366.54M
NASB Financial
Price$33.32
Change+$0.04 (+0.12%)
Volume$200
Capitalization215.55M
FFIC vs NASB Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FFIC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NASB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FFIC vs. NASB commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFIC is a Buy and NASB is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (FFIC: $12.73 vs. NASB: $33.32)
Brand notoriety: FFIC and NASB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FFIC: 128% vs. NASB: 35%
Market capitalization -- FFIC: $366.54M vs. NASB: $215.55M
FFIC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $366.54M. NASB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $215.55M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FFIC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileNASB’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FFIC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • NASB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both FFIC and NASB are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FFIC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NASB’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FFIC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • NASB’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NASB is a better buy in the short-term than FFIC.

Price Growth

FFIC (@Regional Banks) experienced а +7.34% price change this week, while NASB (@Regional Banks) price change was -1.20% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.97%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.56%.

Reported Earning Dates

FFIC is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.97% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFIC($367M) has a higher market cap than NASB($216M). FFIC has higher P/E ratio than NASB: FFIC (13.08) vs NASB (7.51). FFIC YTD gains are higher at: -7.667 vs. NASB (-9.706). NASB has less debt than FFIC: NASB (628M) vs FFIC (882M). FFIC has higher revenues than NASB: FFIC (202M) vs NASB (124M).
FFICNASBFFIC / NASB
Capitalization367M216M170%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-7.667-9.70679%
P/E Ratio13.087.51174%
Revenue202M124M163%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt882M628M140%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FFIC vs NASB: Fundamental Ratings
FFIC
NASB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
16
Undervalued
13
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8295
SMR RATING
1..100
3140
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5361
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4049
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a65

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NASB's Valuation (13) in the null industry is in the same range as FFIC (16) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that NASB’s stock grew similarly to FFIC’s over the last 12 months.

FFIC's Profit vs Risk Rating (82) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as NASB (95) in the null industry. This means that FFIC’s stock grew similarly to NASB’s over the last 12 months.

FFIC's SMR Rating (31) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as NASB (40) in the null industry. This means that FFIC’s stock grew similarly to NASB’s over the last 12 months.

FFIC's Price Growth Rating (53) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as NASB (61) in the null industry. This means that FFIC’s stock grew similarly to NASB’s over the last 12 months.

FFIC's P/E Growth Rating (40) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as NASB (49) in the null industry. This means that FFIC’s stock grew similarly to NASB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FFICNASB
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
31%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
39%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
46%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
35%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
41%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
59%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
63%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
43%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
38%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FFIC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NASB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MNRGX42.250.40
+0.96%
Manor Growth
GWEIX33.150.22
+0.67%
AMG GW&K Small Cap Core I
HSEIX12.350.08
+0.65%
Hartford Small Cap Value I
TEMPX9.000.04
+0.45%
Nuveen Emerging Markets Eq Prem
GTECX47.120.14
+0.30%
Gateway C

FFIC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FFIC has been closely correlated with TCBK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FFIC jumps, then TCBK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FFIC
1D Price
Change %
FFIC100%
+1.92%
TCBK - FFIC
83%
Closely correlated
+1.27%
EQBK - FFIC
82%
Closely correlated
+1.64%
OCFC - FFIC
82%
Closely correlated
+1.08%
STEL - FFIC
82%
Closely correlated
+1.37%
UBSI - FFIC
82%
Closely correlated
+0.95%
More

NASB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NASB and SSB have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NASB and SSB's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NASB
1D Price
Change %
NASB100%
+0.10%
SSB - NASB
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.13%
FHB - NASB
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.72%
OZK - NASB
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.10%
FFIC - NASB
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.92%
ORRF - NASB
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.26%
More