Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFGTX vs SEPCX
FFGTX vs SEPCX Comparison
Open Charts FFGTX vs SEPCX
Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stk M
Price$21.51
Change+$0.16 (+0.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets927.58M
Saratoga Energy & Basic Materials C
Price$9.79
Change+$0.09 (+0.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets969.8K
FFGTX vs SEPCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFGTX vs. SEPCX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFGTX is a Hold and SEPCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFGTX has more cash in the bank: 928M vs. SEPCX (970K). FFGTX pays higher dividends than SEPCX: FFGTX (1.61) vs SEPCX (1.46). FFGTX was incepted earlier than SEPCX: FFGTX (17 years) vs SEPCX (23 years). SEPCX (4.85) is less costly to investors than FFGTX (1.40). FFGTX (49.00) and SEPCX (47.00) have comparable annual turnover. FFGTX has a lower initial minimum investment than SEPCX: FFGTX (0) vs SEPCX (250). FFGTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.74 vs. SEPCX (-5.82). FFGTX return over 5 years is better than : 108.23 vs. SEPCX (74.07).
| FFGTX | SEPCX | FFGTX / SEPCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 4.85 | 29% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 4.85 | 29% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.942 | 3.743 | 506% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 928M | 970K | 95,670% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.61 | 1.46 | 110% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.74 | -5.82 | -219% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.52 | 10.13 | 213% |
| Returns for 5 years | 108.23 | 74.07 | 146% |
| Returns for 10 years | 127.07 | 9.44 | 1,346% |