Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFGTX vs SEPCX
FFGTX vs SEPCX Comparison
Open Charts FFGTX vs SEPCX
Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stk M
Price$22.00
Change-$0.11 (-0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets920.12M
Saratoga Energy & Basic Materials C
Price$9.93
Change-$0.01 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets988.21K
FFGTX vs SEPCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFGTX vs. SEPCX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFGTX is a Buy and SEPCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFGTX has more cash in the bank: 920M vs. SEPCX (988K). FFGTX pays higher dividends than SEPCX: FFGTX (1.63) vs SEPCX (1.50). FFGTX was incepted earlier than SEPCX: FFGTX (17 years) vs SEPCX (23 years). SEPCX (4.85) is less costly to investors than FFGTX (1.40). FFGTX (49.00) and SEPCX (47.00) have comparable annual turnover. FFGTX has a lower initial minimum investment than SEPCX: FFGTX (0) vs SEPCX (250). FFGTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.69 vs. SEPCX (-1.22). FFGTX return over 5 years is better than : 102.85 vs. SEPCX (67.07).
| FFGTX | SEPCX | FFGTX / SEPCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 4.85 | 29% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 4.85 | 29% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.173 | 6.310 | 351% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 920M | 988K | 93,117% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.63 | 1.50 | 109% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.69 | -1.22 | -1,452% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.77 | -0.09 | -14,705% |
| Returns for 5 years | 102.85 | 67.07 | 153% |
| Returns for 10 years | 150.02 | 15.09 | 994% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement