Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFGTX vs RGNCX
FFGTX vs RGNCX Comparison
Open Charts FFGTX vs RGNCX
Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stk M
Price$22.64
Change+$0.04 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets964.05M
Victory Global Energy Transition C
Price$43.97
Change-$0.05 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets473.02M
FFGTX vs RGNCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFGTX vs. RGNCX commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFGTX is a Buy and RGNCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFGTX has more cash in the bank: 964M vs. RGNCX (473M). FFGTX pays higher dividends than RGNCX: FFGTX (1.56) vs RGNCX (0.81). FFGTX was incepted earlier than RGNCX: FFGTX (17 years) vs RGNCX (19 years). RGNCX (3.36) is less costly to investors than FFGTX (1.40). RGNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. FFGTX (49.00). FFGTX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGNCX: FFGTX (0) vs RGNCX (2500). RGNCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 64.62 vs. FFGTX (26.68). RGNCX return over 5 years is better than : 310.59 vs. FFGTX (84.09).
| FFGTX | RGNCX | FFGTX / RGNCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 2.28 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 3.36 | 42% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 25.905 | 62.251 | 42% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 964M | 473M | 204% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.56 | 0.81 | 192% |
| Returns for 1 year | 26.68 | 64.62 | 41% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.03 | 68.88 | 29% |
| Returns for 5 years | 84.09 | 310.59 | 27% |
| Returns for 10 years | 176.39 | 212.26 | 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers