Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFGTX vs RGNCX
FFGTX vs RGNCX Comparison
Open Charts FFGTX vs RGNCX
Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stk M
Price$25.95
Change+$4.47 (+20.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.19B
Victory Global Energy Transition C
Price$51.01
Change+$9.64 (+23.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets550.52M
FFGTX vs RGNCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFGTX vs. RGNCX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFGTX is a Hold and RGNCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFGTX has more cash in the bank: 1.19B vs. RGNCX (551M). RGNCX pays higher dividends than FFGTX: RGNCX (3.95) vs FFGTX (1.79). FFGTX was incepted earlier than RGNCX: FFGTX (17 years) vs RGNCX (19 years). RGNCX (3.36) is less costly to investors than FFGTX (1.39). FFGTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 78.00 vs. RGNCX (57.00). FFGTX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGNCX: FFGTX (0) vs RGNCX (2500). RGNCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 104.69 vs. FFGTX (39.18). RGNCX return over 5 years is better than : 341.58 vs. FFGTX (100.24).
| FFGTX | RGNCX | FFGTX / RGNCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 2.28 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 3.36 | 41% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.861 | 17.157 | 69% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.19B | 551M | 216% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.79 | 3.95 | 45% |
| Returns for 1 year | 39.18 | 104.69 | 37% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.10 | 98.24 | 37% |
| Returns for 5 years | 100.24 | 341.58 | 29% |
| Returns for 10 years | 237.63 | 296.08 | 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement