Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFGTX vs PNRZX
FFGTX vs PNRZX Comparison
Open Charts FFGTX vs PNRZX
Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stk M
Price$22.00
Change-$0.11 (-0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets920.12M
PGIM Jennison Natural Resources Z
Price$68.51
Change-$1.27 (-1.82%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets742.14M
FFGTX vs PNRZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFGTX vs. PNRZX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFGTX is a Buy and PNRZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFGTX has more cash in the bank: 920M vs. PNRZX (742M). FFGTX pays higher dividends than PNRZX: FFGTX (1.63) vs PNRZX (0.99). FFGTX was incepted earlier than PNRZX: FFGTX (17 years) vs PNRZX (29 years). FFGTX (1.40) is less costly to investors than PNRZX (0.92). FFGTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. PNRZX (31.00). FFGTX (0) and PNRZX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. PNRZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.67 vs. FFGTX (17.69). PNRZX return over 5 years is better than : 137.19 vs. FFGTX (102.85).
| FFGTX | PNRZX | FFGTX / PNRZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 0.92 | 152% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 0.92 | 152% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.173 | 30.699 | 72% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 920M | 742M | 124% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.63 | 0.99 | 164% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.69 | 24.67 | 72% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.77 | 17.67 | 72% |
| Returns for 5 years | 102.85 | 137.19 | 75% |
| Returns for 10 years | 150.02 | 137.30 | 109% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement