Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFGTX vs PNRZX
FFGTX vs PNRZX Comparison
Open Charts FFGTX vs PNRZX
Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stk M
Price$22.54
Change+$0.33 (+1.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets964.05M
PGIM Jennison Natural Resources Z
Price$72.47
Change+$1.47 (+2.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets767.76M
FFGTX vs PNRZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFGTX vs. PNRZX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFGTX is a Buy and PNRZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFGTX has more cash in the bank: 964M vs. PNRZX (768M). FFGTX pays higher dividends than PNRZX: FFGTX (1.56) vs PNRZX (0.95). FFGTX was incepted earlier than PNRZX: FFGTX (17 years) vs PNRZX (29 years). FFGTX (1.40) is less costly to investors than PNRZX (0.92). FFGTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. PNRZX (31.00). FFGTX (0) and PNRZX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. PNRZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.52 vs. FFGTX (17.85). PNRZX return over 5 years is better than : 122.54 vs. FFGTX (88.10).
| FFGTX | PNRZX | FFGTX / PNRZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 0.92 | 152% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 0.92 | 152% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 24.791 | 34.145 | 73% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 964M | 768M | 126% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.56 | 0.95 | 165% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.85 | 25.52 | 70% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.63 | 21.94 | 67% |
| Returns for 5 years | 88.10 | 122.54 | 72% |
| Returns for 10 years | 163.63 | 148.44 | 110% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement