Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFGTX vs PNRZX
FFGTX vs PNRZX Comparison
Open Charts FFGTX vs PNRZX
Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stk M
Price$25.95
Change+$4.47 (+20.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.19B
PGIM Jennison Natural Resources Z
Price$86.96
Change+$18.28 (+26.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets901.65M
FFGTX vs PNRZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFGTX vs. PNRZX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFGTX is a Hold and PNRZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFGTX has more cash in the bank: 1.19B vs. PNRZX (902M). FFGTX pays higher dividends than PNRZX: FFGTX (1.79) vs PNRZX (1.02). FFGTX was incepted earlier than PNRZX: FFGTX (17 years) vs PNRZX (29 years). FFGTX (1.39) is less costly to investors than PNRZX (0.92). FFGTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 78.00 vs. PNRZX (57.00). PNRZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 61.52 vs. FFGTX (39.18). PNRZX return over 5 years is better than : 138.02 vs. FFGTX (100.24).
| FFGTX | PNRZX | FFGTX / PNRZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 0.92 | 151% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 0.92 | 151% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.861 | 18.523 | 64% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.19B | 902M | 132% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.79 | 1.02 | 175% |
| Returns for 1 year | 39.18 | 61.52 | 64% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.10 | 62.33 | 58% |
| Returns for 5 years | 100.24 | 138.02 | 73% |
| Returns for 10 years | 237.63 | 261.23 | 91% |