Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFGTX vs PNRCX
FFGTX vs PNRCX Comparison
Open Charts FFGTX vs PNRCX
Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stk M
Price$22.21
Change-$0.54 (-2.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets964.05M
PGIM Jennison Natural Resources C
Price$53.07
Change-$0.92 (-1.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets772.66M
FFGTX vs PNRCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFGTX vs. PNRCX commentary
Dec 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFGTX is a Buy and PNRCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFGTX has more cash in the bank: 964M vs. PNRCX (773M). FFGTX pays higher dividends than PNRCX: FFGTX (1.56) vs PNRCX (0.46). FFGTX was incepted earlier than PNRCX: FFGTX (17 years) vs PNRCX (31 years). PNRCX (2.03) is less costly to investors than FFGTX (1.40). FFGTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. PNRCX (31.00). FFGTX has a lower initial minimum investment than PNRCX: FFGTX (0) vs PNRCX (1000). PNRCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.29 vs. FFGTX (18.84). PNRCX return over 5 years is better than : 111.28 vs. FFGTX (83.17).
| FFGTX | PNRCX | FFGTX / PNRCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 2.03 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 2.03 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 25.181 | 37.449 | 67% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 964M | 773M | 125% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.56 | 0.46 | 338% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.84 | 29.29 | 64% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.83 | 34.14 | 58% |
| Returns for 5 years | 83.17 | 111.28 | 75% |
| Returns for 10 years | 188.01 | 157.08 | 120% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement