Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFGTX vs PNRCX
FFGTX vs PNRCX Comparison
Open Charts FFGTX vs PNRCX
Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stk M
Price$22.00
Change-$0.11 (-0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets920.12M
PGIM Jennison Natural Resources C
Price$49.92
Change-$0.93 (-1.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets742.14M
FFGTX vs PNRCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFGTX vs. PNRCX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFGTX is a Buy and PNRCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFGTX has more cash in the bank: 920M vs. PNRCX (742M). FFGTX pays higher dividends than PNRCX: FFGTX (1.63) vs PNRCX (0.48). FFGTX was incepted earlier than PNRCX: FFGTX (17 years) vs PNRCX (31 years). PNRCX (2.03) is less costly to investors than FFGTX (1.40). FFGTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. PNRCX (31.00). FFGTX has a lower initial minimum investment than PNRCX: FFGTX (0) vs PNRCX (1000). PNRCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.10 vs. FFGTX (19.22). PNRCX return over 5 years is better than : 120.40 vs. FFGTX (104.52).
| FFGTX | PNRCX | FFGTX / PNRCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 2.03 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 2.03 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 23.175 | 27.088 | 86% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 920M | 742M | 124% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.63 | 0.48 | 337% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.22 | 22.10 | 87% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.59 | 12.37 | 110% |
| Returns for 5 years | 104.52 | 120.40 | 87% |
| Returns for 10 years | 148.70 | 107.26 | 139% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement