Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFGTX vs PNRCX
FFGTX vs PNRCX Comparison
Open Charts FFGTX vs PNRCX
Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stk M
Price$24.51
Change+$0.50 (+2.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets993.39M
PGIM Jennison Natural Resources C
Price$58.58
Change+$0.87 (+1.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets856.37M
FFGTX vs PNRCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFGTX vs. PNRCX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFGTX is a Hold and PNRCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFGTX has more cash in the bank: 993M vs. PNRCX (856M). FFGTX pays higher dividends than PNRCX: FFGTX (2.02) vs PNRCX (0.76). FFGTX was incepted earlier than PNRCX: FFGTX (17 years) vs PNRCX (31 years). PNRCX (2.03) is less costly to investors than FFGTX (1.40). FFGTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. PNRCX (31.00). FFGTX has a lower initial minimum investment than PNRCX: FFGTX (0) vs PNRCX (1000). PNRCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 42.80 vs. FFGTX (33.22). PNRCX return over 5 years is better than : 105.65 vs. FFGTX (85.07).
| FFGTX | PNRCX | FFGTX / PNRCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 2.03 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 2.03 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.664 | 9.271 | 72% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 993M | 856M | 116% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.02 | 0.76 | 265% |
| Returns for 1 year | 33.22 | 42.80 | 78% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.35 | 37.47 | 70% |
| Returns for 5 years | 85.07 | 105.65 | 81% |
| Returns for 10 years | 246.97 | 226.79 | 109% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement