Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFGTX vs PNRCX
FFGTX vs PNRCX Comparison
Open Charts FFGTX vs PNRCX
Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stk M
Price$21.35
Change-$0.18 (-0.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets927.58M
PGIM Jennison Natural Resources C
Price$49.47
Change-$1.15 (-2.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets742.56M
FFGTX vs PNRCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFGTX vs. PNRCX commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFGTX is a Hold and PNRCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFGTX has more cash in the bank: 928M vs. PNRCX (743M). FFGTX pays higher dividends than PNRCX: FFGTX (1.61) vs PNRCX (0.49). FFGTX was incepted earlier than PNRCX: FFGTX (17 years) vs PNRCX (31 years). PNRCX (2.03) is less costly to investors than FFGTX (1.40). FFGTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. PNRCX (31.00). FFGTX has a lower initial minimum investment than PNRCX: FFGTX (0) vs PNRCX (1000). PNRCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.90 vs. FFGTX (13.69). PNRCX return over 5 years is better than : 130.99 vs. FFGTX (109.99).
| FFGTX | PNRCX | FFGTX / PNRCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 2.03 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 2.03 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.944 | 25.942 | 77% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 928M | 743M | 125% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.61 | 0.49 | 331% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.69 | 17.90 | 76% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.54 | 25.52 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 109.99 | 130.99 | 84% |
| Returns for 10 years | 128.99 | 99.24 | 130% |