Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFGTX vs PNRCX
FFGTX vs PNRCX Comparison
Open Charts FFGTX vs PNRCX
Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stk M
Price$25.95
Change+$4.47 (+20.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.19B
PGIM Jennison Natural Resources C
Price$63.48
Change+$13.39 (+26.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets901.65M
FFGTX vs PNRCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFGTX vs. PNRCX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFGTX is a Hold and PNRCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFGTX has more cash in the bank: 1.19B vs. PNRCX (902M). FFGTX pays higher dividends than PNRCX: FFGTX (1.79) vs PNRCX (0.67). FFGTX was incepted earlier than PNRCX: FFGTX (17 years) vs PNRCX (32 years). PNRCX (2.03) is less costly to investors than FFGTX (1.39). FFGTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 78.00 vs. PNRCX (57.00). FFGTX has a lower initial minimum investment than PNRCX: FFGTX (0) vs PNRCX (1000). PNRCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 59.73 vs. FFGTX (39.18). PNRCX return over 5 years is better than : 125.45 vs. FFGTX (100.24).
| FFGTX | PNRCX | FFGTX / PNRCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 2.03 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 2.03 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.861 | 18.411 | 64% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.19B | 902M | 132% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.79 | 0.67 | 269% |
| Returns for 1 year | 39.18 | 59.73 | 66% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.10 | 57.07 | 63% |
| Returns for 5 years | 100.24 | 125.45 | 80% |
| Returns for 10 years | 237.63 | 229.98 | 103% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement