Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFGTX vs INRSX
FFGTX vs INRSX Comparison
Open Charts FFGTX vs INRSX
Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stk M
Price$25.95
Change+$4.47 (+20.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.19B
Nomura Natural Resources R6
Price$24.72
Change+$4.21 (+20.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets234.67M
FFGTX vs INRSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFGTX vs. INRSX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFGTX is a Hold and INRSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFGTX has more cash in the bank: 1.19B vs. INRSX (235M). FFGTX pays higher dividends than INRSX: FFGTX (1.79) vs INRSX (0.00). FFGTX was incepted earlier than INRSX: FFGTX (17 years) vs INRSX (12 years). FFGTX (1.39) is less costly to investors than INRSX (1.06). FFGTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 78.00 vs. INRSX (47.00). FFGTX (0) and INRSX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. INRSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 52.22 vs. FFGTX (39.18). INRSX return over 5 years is better than : 131.99 vs. FFGTX (100.24).
| FFGTX | INRSX | FFGTX / INRSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 0.80 | 174% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 1.06 | 131% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.861 | 13.812 | 86% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.19B | 235M | 507% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.79 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 39.18 | 52.22 | 75% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.10 | 53.21 | 68% |
| Returns for 5 years | 100.24 | 131.99 | 76% |
| Returns for 10 years | 237.63 | 151.24 | 157% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement