Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFGTX vs INRSX
FFGTX vs INRSX Comparison
Open Charts FFGTX vs INRSX
Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stk M
Price$22.54
Change+$0.33 (+1.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets964.05M
Nomura Natural Resources R6
Price$21.31
Change+$0.33 (+1.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets203.27M
FFGTX vs INRSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFGTX vs. INRSX commentary
Dec 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFGTX is a Buy and INRSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFGTX has more cash in the bank: 964M vs. INRSX (203M). INRSX pays higher dividends than FFGTX: INRSX (4.20) vs FFGTX (1.56). FFGTX was incepted earlier than INRSX: FFGTX (17 years) vs INRSX (11 years). FFGTX (1.40) is less costly to investors than INRSX (1.06). FFGTX (49.00) and INRSX (47.00) have comparable annual turnover. FFGTX (0) and INRSX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. INRSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.99 vs. FFGTX (17.74). INRSX return over 5 years is better than : 105.97 vs. FFGTX (84.72).
| FFGTX | INRSX | FFGTX / INRSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 0.80 | 175% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 1.06 | 132% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 25.571 | 35.906 | 71% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 964M | 203M | 475% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.56 | 4.20 | 37% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.74 | 23.99 | 74% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.34 | 30.62 | 50% |
| Returns for 5 years | 84.72 | 105.97 | 80% |
| Returns for 10 years | 165.27 | 82.20 | 201% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement