Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFGTX vs IGNCX
FFGTX vs IGNCX Comparison
Open Charts FFGTX vs IGNCX
Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stk M
Price$25.95
Change+$4.47 (+20.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.19B
Nomura Natural Resources C
Price$18.39
Change+$3.08 (+20.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets234.67M
FFGTX vs IGNCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFGTX vs. IGNCX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFGTX is a Hold and IGNCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFGTX has more cash in the bank: 1.19B vs. IGNCX (235M). FFGTX pays higher dividends than IGNCX: FFGTX (1.79) vs IGNCX (0.00). FFGTX was incepted earlier than IGNCX: FFGTX (17 years) vs IGNCX (29 years). IGNCX (2.23) is less costly to investors than FFGTX (1.39). FFGTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 78.00 vs. IGNCX (47.00). FFGTX has a lower initial minimum investment than IGNCX: FFGTX (0) vs IGNCX (1000). IGNCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 50.49 vs. FFGTX (39.18). IGNCX return over 5 years is better than : 113.61 vs. FFGTX (100.24).
| FFGTX | IGNCX | FFGTX / IGNCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 1.97 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 2.23 | 62% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.861 | 13.659 | 87% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.19B | 235M | 507% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.79 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 39.18 | 50.49 | 78% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.10 | 48.20 | 75% |
| Returns for 5 years | 100.24 | 113.61 | 88% |
| Returns for 10 years | 237.63 | 117.50 | 202% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement