Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFGTX vs IGNCX
FFGTX vs IGNCX Comparison
Open Charts FFGTX vs IGNCX
Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stk M
Price$21.35
Change-$0.18 (-0.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets927.58M
Macquarie Natural Resources C
Price$15.14
Change-$0.26 (-1.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets195.6M
FFGTX vs IGNCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFGTX vs. IGNCX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFGTX is a Hold and IGNCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFGTX has more cash in the bank: 928M vs. IGNCX (196M). IGNCX pays higher dividends than FFGTX: IGNCX (5.10) vs FFGTX (1.61). FFGTX was incepted earlier than IGNCX: FFGTX (17 years) vs IGNCX (29 years). IGNCX (2.23) is less costly to investors than FFGTX (1.40). FFGTX (49.00) and IGNCX (47.00) have comparable annual turnover. FFGTX has a lower initial minimum investment than IGNCX: FFGTX (0) vs IGNCX (1000). IGNCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.80 vs. FFGTX (12.74). FFGTX return over 5 years is better than : 108.23 vs. IGNCX (95.03).
| FFGTX | IGNCX | FFGTX / IGNCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 1.97 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 2.23 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.942 | 28.196 | 67% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 928M | 196M | 473% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.61 | 5.10 | 32% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.74 | 18.80 | 68% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.52 | 27.14 | 79% |
| Returns for 5 years | 108.23 | 95.03 | 114% |
| Returns for 10 years | 127.07 | 41.93 | 303% |