Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFGTX vs GRHAX
FFGTX vs GRHAX Comparison
Open Charts FFGTX vs GRHAX
Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stk M
Price$21.35
Change-$0.18 (-0.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets927.58M
Goehring & Rozencwajg Resources Retail
Price$18.64
Change-$0.75 (-3.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets694.88M
FFGTX vs GRHAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFGTX vs. GRHAX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFGTX is a Hold and GRHAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFGTX has more cash in the bank: 928M vs. GRHAX (695M). GRHAX pays higher dividends than FFGTX: GRHAX (2.61) vs FFGTX (1.61). FFGTX was incepted earlier than GRHAX: FFGTX (17 years) vs GRHAX (9 years). GRHAX (1.52) is less costly to investors than FFGTX (1.40). FFGTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. GRHAX (24.00). FFGTX has a lower initial minimum investment than GRHAX: FFGTX (0) vs GRHAX (3000). GRHAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 40.64 vs. FFGTX (12.74). GRHAX return over 5 years is better than : 303.17 vs. FFGTX (108.23).
| FFGTX | GRHAX | FFGTX / GRHAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 1.28 | 109% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 1.52 | 92% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.942 | 50.081 | 38% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 3000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 928M | 695M | 134% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.61 | 2.61 | 62% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.74 | 40.64 | 31% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.52 | 70.26 | 31% |
| Returns for 5 years | 108.23 | 303.17 | 36% |
| Returns for 10 years | 127.07 | N/A | - |