Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFFMX vs HWLZX
FFFMX vs HWLZX Comparison
Open Charts FFFMX vs HWLZX
American Funds American Mutual 529-F-3
Price$62.25
Change-$0.71 (-1.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets112.28B
Hotchkis & Wiley Large Cap Fdml Value Z
Price$46.27
Change-$0.35 (-0.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets356.7M
FFFMX vs HWLZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFFMX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. HWLZX (357M). FFFMX pays higher dividends than HWLZX: FFFMX (1.72) vs HWLZX (1.50). FFFMX was incepted earlier than HWLZX: FFFMX (5 years) vs HWLZX (6 years). HWLZX (0.85) is less costly to investors than FFFMX (0.32). HWLZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. FFFMX (31.00). FFFMX has a lower initial minimum investment than HWLZX: FFFMX (250) vs HWLZX (1000000). FFFMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.18 vs. HWLZX (-0.94). FFFMX return over 5 years is better than : 57.89 vs. HWLZX (54.87).
| FFFMX | HWLZX | FFFMX / HWLZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.32 | 0.85 | 38% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.32 | 0.85 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.369 | 13.046 | 110% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 112B | 357M | 31,373% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.72 | 1.50 | 115% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.18 | -0.94 | -660% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.40 | 9.91 | 327% |
| Returns for 5 years | 57.89 | 54.87 | 105% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement