FFDF
Price
$35.74
Change
+$0.24 (+0.68%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
103.57M
UNTN
Price
$21.00
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
15.55M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FFDF vs UNTN

Header iconFFDF vs UNTN Comparison
Open Charts FFDF vs UNTNBanner chart's image
FFD Financial
Price$35.74
Change+$0.24 (+0.68%)
Volume$200
Capitalization103.57M
United Tennessee Bankshares
Price$21.00
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.41K
Capitalization15.55M
FFDF vs UNTN Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FFDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UNTN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FFDF vs. UNTN commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFDF is a StrongBuy and UNTN is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (FFDF: $35.74 vs. UNTN: $21.00)
Brand notoriety: FFDF and UNTN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FFDF: 16% vs. UNTN: 83%
Market capitalization -- FFDF: $103.57M vs. UNTN: $15.55M
FFDF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $103.57M. UNTN’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $15.55M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $167.72B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.76B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FFDF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileUNTN’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FFDF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • UNTN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FFDF is a better buy in the long-term than UNTN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FFDF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UNTN’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FFDF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • UNTN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, UNTN is a better buy in the short-term than FFDF.

Price Growth

FFDF (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.03% price change this week, while UNTN (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.39%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.29%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.15% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFDF($104M) has a higher market cap than UNTN($15.5M). UNTN has higher P/E ratio than FFDF: UNTN (10.24) vs FFDF (9.09). UNTN YTD gains are higher at: 34.023 vs. FFDF (11.159). FFDF has more cash in the bank: 17.5M vs. UNTN (12.8M). UNTN has less debt than FFDF: UNTN (1M) vs FFDF (15M).
FFDFUNTNFFDF / UNTN
Capitalization104M15.5M671%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD11.15934.02333%
P/E Ratio9.0910.2489%
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total Cash17.5M12.8M137%
Total Debt15M1M1,500%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FFDF vs UNTN: Fundamental Ratings
FFDF
UNTN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
36
Fair valued
84
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3760
SMR RATING
1..100
477
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5246
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3236
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7533

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FFDF's Valuation (36) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UNTN (84). This means that FFDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than UNTN’s over the last 12 months.

FFDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as UNTN (60). This means that FFDF’s stock grew similarly to UNTN’s over the last 12 months.

FFDF's SMR Rating (4) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for UNTN (77). This means that FFDF’s stock grew significantly faster than UNTN’s over the last 12 months.

UNTN's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as FFDF (52). This means that UNTN’s stock grew similarly to FFDF’s over the last 12 months.

FFDF's P/E Growth Rating (32) in the null industry is in the same range as UNTN (36). This means that FFDF’s stock grew similarly to UNTN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FFDFUNTN
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
17%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
24%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
12%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
26%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
19%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
15%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
21%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
24%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
20%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
22%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
42%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
48%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
39%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FFDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UNTN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FTGFF8.49N/A
N/A
Firan Technology Group Corporation
MMNNF16.65N/A
N/A
Munters Group AP
KGTFF0.78N/A
N/A
Krung Thai Bank Public Co., Ltd.
DSHKN8.10N/A
N/A
Drive Shack Inc.
UPYY1.40N/A
N/A
UPAY INC.

FFDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FFDF and BHDB have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FFDF and BHDB's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FFDF
1D Price
Change %
FFDF100%
+0.68%
BHDB - FFDF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
UNTN - FFDF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FFMH - FFDF
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FFWC - FFDF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FFMR - FFDF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

UNTN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UNTN has been loosely correlated with CZBC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UNTN jumps, then CZBC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UNTN
1D Price
Change %
UNTN100%
N/A
CZBC - UNTN
39%
Loosely correlated
N/A
FNWB - UNTN
27%
Poorly correlated
-1.39%
SFBS - UNTN
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.84%
FFBC - UNTN
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.20%
FBK - UNTN
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.92%
More