FFDF
Price
$35.74
Change
+$0.24 (+0.68%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
103.57M
FFWC
Price
$41.75
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 2 closing price
Capitalization
45.35M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FFDF vs FFWC

Header iconFFDF vs FFWC Comparison
Open Charts FFDF vs FFWCBanner chart's image
FFD Financial
Price$35.74
Change+$0.24 (+0.68%)
Volume$200
Capitalization103.57M
FFW
Price$41.75
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$3.3K
Capitalization45.35M
FFDF vs FFWC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FFDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FFWC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FFDF vs. FFWC commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFDF is a StrongBuy and FFWC is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (FFDF: $35.74 vs. FFWC: $41.75)
Brand notoriety: FFDF and FFWC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FFDF: 16% vs. FFWC: 250%
Market capitalization -- FFDF: $103.57M vs. FFWC: $45.35M
FFDF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $103.57M. FFWC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $45.35M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $167.72B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.76B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FFDF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFFWC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FFDF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FFWC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both FFDF and FFWC are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FFDF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FFWC’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FFDF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FFWC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FFWC is a better buy in the short-term than FFDF.

Price Growth

FFDF (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.03% price change this week, while FFWC (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.39%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.29%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.15% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFDF($104M) has a higher market cap than FFWC($45.4M). FFWC has higher P/E ratio than FFDF: FFWC (11.50) vs FFDF (9.09). FFDF YTD gains are higher at: 11.159 vs. FFWC (5.965). FFDF has less debt than FFWC: FFDF (15M) vs FFWC (58.7M).
FFDFFFWCFFDF / FFWC
Capitalization104M45.4M229%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD11.1595.965187%
P/E Ratio9.0911.5079%
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total Cash17.5MN/A-
Total Debt15M58.7M26%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FFDF vs FFWC: Fundamental Ratings
FFDF
FFWC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
36
Fair valued
41
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3754
SMR RATING
1..100
45
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5250
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3213
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FFDF's Valuation (36) in the null industry is in the same range as FFWC (41). This means that FFDF’s stock grew similarly to FFWC’s over the last 12 months.

FFDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as FFWC (54). This means that FFDF’s stock grew similarly to FFWC’s over the last 12 months.

FFDF's SMR Rating (4) in the null industry is in the same range as FFWC (5). This means that FFDF’s stock grew similarly to FFWC’s over the last 12 months.

FFWC's Price Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as FFDF (52). This means that FFWC’s stock grew similarly to FFDF’s over the last 12 months.

FFWC's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the null industry is in the same range as FFDF (32). This means that FFWC’s stock grew similarly to FFDF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FFDFFFWC
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
30%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
17%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
24%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
12%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
16%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
19%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
27%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
21%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
19%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
20%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
20%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
44%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
35%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
29%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FFDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FFWC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EJPRF24.52N/A
N/A
East Japan Railway Co.
EXETF9.35N/A
N/A
Extendicare, Inc.
REVFF0.16N/A
N/A
REV Explorations Corp.
BCHHF495.77N/A
N/A
Bucher Holding AG
CRECF0.30-0.02
-6.25%
Critical Elements Lithium Corporation

FFDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FFDF and BHDB have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FFDF and BHDB's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FFDF
1D Price
Change %
FFDF100%
+0.68%
BHDB - FFDF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
UNTN - FFDF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FFMH - FFDF
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FFWC - FFDF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FFMR - FFDF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

FFWC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FFWC and FFDF have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FFWC and FFDF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FFWC
1D Price
Change %
FFWC100%
N/A
FFDF - FFWC
8%
Poorly correlated
+0.68%
FIBH - FFWC
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FFMR - FFWC
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FGFH - FFWC
-4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FINN - FFWC
-4%
Poorly correlated
+0.12%
More