FFDF
Price
$36.00
Change
+$0.21 (+0.59%)
Updated
Sep 22 closing price
Capitalization
104.35M
FFMH
Price
$45.10
Change
-$0.05 (-0.11%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
180.28M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FFDF vs FFMH

Header iconFFDF vs FFMH Comparison
Open Charts FFDF vs FFMHBanner chart's image
FFD Financial
Price$36.00
Change+$0.21 (+0.59%)
Volume$600
Capitalization104.35M
First Farmers & Merchants
Price$45.10
Change-$0.05 (-0.11%)
Volume$300
Capitalization180.28M
FFDF vs FFMH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FFDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FFMH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FFDF vs. FFMH commentary
Sep 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFDF is a StrongBuy and FFMH is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 28, 2025
Stock price -- (FFDF: $36.00 vs. FFMH: $45.10)
Brand notoriety: FFDF and FFMH are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FFDF: 56% vs. FFMH: 19%
Market capitalization -- FFDF: $104.35M vs. FFMH: $180.28M
FFDF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $104.35M. FFMH’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $180.28M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $163.52B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FFDF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileFFMH’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FFDF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • FFMH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FFDF is a better buy in the long-term than FFMH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FFDF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FFMH’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FFDF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • FFMH’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FFDF is a better buy in the short-term than FFMH.

Price Growth

FFDF (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.59% price change this week, while FFMH (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.20% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.92%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.08% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFMH($180M) has a higher market cap than FFDF($104M). FFMH has higher P/E ratio than FFDF: FFMH (10.23) vs FFDF (8.43). FFMH YTD gains are higher at: 30.692 vs. FFDF (11.967). FFMH has more cash in the bank: 25.6M vs. FFDF (17.5M). FFMH has less debt than FFDF: FFMH (10M) vs FFDF (15M).
FFDFFFMHFFDF / FFMH
Capitalization104M180M58%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD11.96730.69239%
P/E Ratio8.4310.2382%
RevenueN/A62.9M-
Total Cash17.5M25.6M68%
Total Debt15M10M150%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FFDF vs FFMH: Fundamental Ratings
FFDF
FFMH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
31
Undervalued
67
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3731
SMR RATING
1..100
449
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5047
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3245
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FFDF's Valuation (31) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FFMH (67). This means that FFDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FFMH’s over the last 12 months.

FFMH's Profit vs Risk Rating (31) in the null industry is in the same range as FFDF (37). This means that FFMH’s stock grew similarly to FFDF’s over the last 12 months.

FFDF's SMR Rating (4) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FFMH (49). This means that FFDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FFMH’s over the last 12 months.

FFMH's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as FFDF (50). This means that FFMH’s stock grew similarly to FFDF’s over the last 12 months.

FFDF's P/E Growth Rating (32) in the null industry is in the same range as FFMH (45). This means that FFDF’s stock grew similarly to FFMH’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FFDFFFMH
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
34%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
28%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
29%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
35%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
51%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
38%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
39%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
41%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
32%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FFDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FFMH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JNVMX19.040.24
+1.28%
JPMorgan Developed International ValueR6
SLPAX15.110.15
+1.00%
SEI Small Cap A (SIIT)
SLVCX18.240.13
+0.72%
Saratoga Large Capitalization Value C
MRGAX55.800.34
+0.61%
MFS Core Equity A
PDEZX19.96-0.33
-1.63%
PGIM Jennison Emerging Markets Eq Opps Z

FFDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FFDF and BHDB have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FFDF and BHDB's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FFDF
1D Price
Change %
FFDF100%
N/A
BHDB - FFDF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
UNTN - FFDF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FFMH - FFDF
12%
Poorly correlated
-0.11%
FFWC - FFDF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FFMR - FFDF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

FFMH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FFMH and PONT have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FFMH and PONT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FFMH
1D Price
Change %
FFMH100%
-0.11%
PONT - FFMH
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GSBX - FFMH
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CWBC - FFMH
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.03%
NBGRY - FFMH
22%
Poorly correlated
+3.07%
PFIS - FFMH
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.51%
More