Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFCMX vs RLBAX
FFCMX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts FFCMX vs RLBAX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 50% C
Price$21.56
Change+$0.02 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.63B
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$36.83
Change+$0.08 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets254.37B
FFCMX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFCMX vs. RLBAX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFCMX is a StrongBuy and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 254B vs. FFCMX (9.63B). FFCMX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: FFCMX (1.32) vs RLBAX (1.18). FFCMX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: FFCMX (19 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). FFCMX (1.58) is less costly to investors than RLBAX (1.31). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. FFCMX (12.00). FFCMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBAX: FFCMX (0) vs RLBAX (250). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.42 vs. FFCMX (8.87). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 35.28 vs. FFCMX (20.61).
| FFCMX | RLBAX | FFCMX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.58 | 1.31 | 121% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.58 | 1.31 | 121% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.621 | 8.565 | 89% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.63B | 254B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.32 | 1.18 | 112% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.87 | 9.42 | 94% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.61 | 32.14 | 61% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.61 | 35.28 | 58% |
| Returns for 10 years | 34.08 | 58.06 | 59% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement