Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFCMX vs RLBAX
FFCMX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts FFCMX vs RLBAX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 50% C
Price$22.18
Change+$0.07 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.76B
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$38.14
Change+$0.10 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets262.04B
FFCMX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFCMX vs. RLBAX commentary
Sep 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFCMX is a Hold and RLBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 262B vs. FFCMX (9.76B). FFCMX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: FFCMX (1.31) vs RLBAX (1.15). FFCMX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: FFCMX (19 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). FFCMX (1.58) is less costly to investors than RLBAX (1.31). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. FFCMX (12.00). FFCMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBAX: FFCMX (0) vs RLBAX (250). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.27 vs. FFCMX (6.30). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 40.00 vs. FFCMX (22.58).
| FFCMX | RLBAX | FFCMX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.58 | 1.31 | 121% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.58 | 1.31 | 121% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.367 | 12.531 | 83% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.76B | 262B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.31 | 1.15 | 114% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.30 | 7.27 | 87% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.46 | 48.19 | 65% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.58 | 40.00 | 56% |
| Returns for 10 years | 46.84 | 74.51 | 63% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers