Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFCMX vs RLBAX
FFCMX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts FFCMX vs RLBAX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 50% C
Price$22.43
Change-$0.22 (-0.97%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.08B
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$38.62
Change-$0.04 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets268.67B
FFCMX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFCMX vs. RLBAX commentary
Nov 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFCMX is a Buy and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 269B vs. FFCMX (10.1B). FFCMX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: FFCMX (1.27) vs RLBAX (1.08). FFCMX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: FFCMX (19 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). FFCMX (1.58) is less costly to investors than RLBAX (1.31). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. FFCMX (12.00). FFCMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBAX: FFCMX (0) vs RLBAX (250). FFCMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.29 vs. RLBAX (7.89). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 35.24 vs. FFCMX (19.81).
| FFCMX | RLBAX | FFCMX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.58 | 1.31 | 121% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.58 | 1.31 | 121% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.396 | 14.065 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.1B | 269B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.27 | 1.08 | 117% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.29 | 7.89 | 130% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.23 | 39.62 | 71% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.81 | 35.24 | 56% |
| Returns for 10 years | 45.02 | 66.41 | 68% |