Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFCMX vs RLBAX
FFCMX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts FFCMX vs RLBAX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 50% C
Price$21.77
Change-$0.02 (-0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.62B
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$37.06
Change-$0.08 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets256.26B
FFCMX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFCMX vs. RLBAX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFCMX is a StrongBuy and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 256B vs. FFCMX (9.62B). FFCMX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: FFCMX (1.34) vs RLBAX (1.17). FFCMX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: FFCMX (19 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). FFCMX (1.58) is less costly to investors than RLBAX (1.31). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. FFCMX (12.00). FFCMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBAX: FFCMX (0) vs RLBAX (250). FFCMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.74 vs. RLBAX (7.15). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.77 vs. FFCMX (19.50).
| FFCMX | RLBAX | FFCMX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.58 | 1.31 | 121% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.58 | 1.31 | 121% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.670 | 9.243 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.62B | 256B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.34 | 1.17 | 114% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.74 | 7.15 | 108% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.38 | 27.06 | 57% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.50 | 33.77 | 58% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.87 | 59.12 | 61% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement