Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFCMX vs RLBAX
FFCMX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts FFCMX vs RLBAX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 50% C
Price$20.88
Change-$0.17 (-0.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.42B
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$35.31
Change-$0.31 (-0.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets244.39B
FFCMX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFCMX vs. RLBAX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFCMX is a StrongBuy and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 244B vs. FFCMX (9.42B). FFCMX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: FFCMX (1.36) vs RLBAX (1.23). FFCMX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: FFCMX (19 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). FFCMX (1.58) is less costly to investors than RLBAX (1.31). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. FFCMX (12.00). FFCMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBAX: FFCMX (0) vs RLBAX (250). FFCMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.99 vs. RLBAX (4.45). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 34.05 vs. FFCMX (21.76).
| FFCMX | RLBAX | FFCMX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.58 | 1.31 | 121% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.58 | 1.31 | 121% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.645 | 4.085 | 114% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.42B | 244B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.36 | 1.23 | 111% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.99 | 4.45 | 135% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.15 | 30.02 | 67% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.76 | 34.05 | 64% |
| Returns for 10 years | 28.87 | 51.23 | 56% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers