FFBW
Price
$14.16
Change
+$0.08 (+0.57%)
Updated
Sep 2 closing price
Capitalization
60.72M
WRIV
Price
$46.35
Change
+$0.15 (+0.32%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
113.48M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FFBW vs WRIV

Header iconFFBW vs WRIV Comparison
Open Charts FFBW vs WRIVBanner chart's image
FFBW
Price$14.16
Change+$0.08 (+0.57%)
Volume$3.76K
Capitalization60.72M
White River Bancshares
Price$46.35
Change+$0.15 (+0.32%)
Volume$1.3K
Capitalization113.48M
FFBW vs WRIV Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FFBW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WRIV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FFBW vs. WRIV commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFBW is a StrongBuy and WRIV is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (FFBW: $14.16 vs. WRIV: $46.35)
Brand notoriety: FFBW and WRIV are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FFBW: 175% vs. WRIV: 57%
Market capitalization -- FFBW: $60.72M vs. WRIV: $113.48M
FFBW [@Regional Banks] is valued at $60.72M. WRIV’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $113.48M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $167.72B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.75B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FFBW’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWRIV’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FFBW’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WRIV’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both FFBW and WRIV are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FFBW’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WRIV’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FFBW’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • WRIV’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FFBW is a better buy in the short-term than WRIV.

Price Growth

FFBW (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.57% price change this week, while WRIV (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.32% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.97%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.09%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.38% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WRIV($113M) has a higher market cap than FFBW($60.7M). FFBW has higher P/E ratio than WRIV: FFBW (41.65) vs WRIV (17.29). WRIV YTD gains are higher at: 34.010 vs. FFBW (-0.562). FFBW has less debt than WRIV: FFBW (3M) vs WRIV (69.6M).
FFBWWRIVFFBW / WRIV
Capitalization60.7M113M54%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-0.56234.010-2%
P/E Ratio41.6517.29241%
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt3M69.6M4%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FFBW vs WRIV: Fundamental Ratings
FFBW
WRIV
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
91
Overvalued
71
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1648
SMR RATING
1..100
8870
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5551
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4934
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
4665

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WRIV's Valuation (71) in the null industry is in the same range as FFBW (91) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that WRIV’s stock grew similarly to FFBW’s over the last 12 months.

FFBW's Profit vs Risk Rating (16) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as WRIV (48) in the null industry. This means that FFBW’s stock grew similarly to WRIV’s over the last 12 months.

WRIV's SMR Rating (70) in the null industry is in the same range as FFBW (88) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that WRIV’s stock grew similarly to FFBW’s over the last 12 months.

WRIV's Price Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as FFBW (55) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that WRIV’s stock grew similarly to FFBW’s over the last 12 months.

WRIV's P/E Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as FFBW (49) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that WRIV’s stock grew similarly to FFBW’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FFBWWRIV
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
21%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
22%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
20%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
29%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
36%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
12%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
28%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
33%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
27%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
36%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
37%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
50%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
24%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
17%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
23%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
45%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FFBW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WRIV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RYHRX42.460.57
+1.36%
Rydex Real Estate H
VSMVX400.822.47
+0.62%
Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Val Idx Instl
GHAIX46.540.25
+0.54%
VanEck Global Resources Fund I
ASMOX21.54N/A
N/A
AQR Small Cap Momentum Style I
FCDTX36.71N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Sm Cp M

FFBW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FFBW has been loosely correlated with GSBX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FFBW jumps, then GSBX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FFBW
1D Price
Change %
FFBW100%
N/A
GSBX - FFBW
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CNBB - FFBW
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
INBC - FFBW
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.31%
WRIV - FFBW
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.32%
OTPBF - FFBW
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

WRIV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WRIV and FFBW have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WRIV and FFBW's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WRIV
1D Price
Change %
WRIV100%
+0.32%
FFBW - WRIV
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TCBS - WRIV
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WBBW - WRIV
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
USMT - WRIV
6%
Poorly correlated
-0.15%
VTYB - WRIV
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More