Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFBFX vs RPFGX
FFBFX vs RPFGX Comparison
Open Charts FFBFX vs RPFGX
Emerald Finance & Bking Innovt Fd I
Price$28.88
Change-$0.19 (-0.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets49.76M
FFBFX vs RPFGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFBFX vs. RPFGX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFBFX is a Buy and RPFGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPFGX has more cash in the bank: 1.14B vs. FFBFX (49.8M). FFBFX pays higher dividends than RPFGX: FFBFX (2.01) vs RPFGX (1.35). FFBFX was incepted earlier than RPFGX: FFBFX (15 years) vs RPFGX (34 years). FFBFX (1.82) is less costly to investors than RPFGX (0.94). FFBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. RPFGX (2.00). RPFGX has a lower initial minimum investment than FFBFX: RPFGX (1000) vs FFBFX (2000). RPFGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.74 vs. FFBFX (16.08). RPFGX return over 5 years is better than : 114.72 vs. FFBFX (35.07).
| FFBFX | RPFGX | FFBFX / RPFGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.82 | 0.94 | 194% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.82 | 0.94 | 194% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 34 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.270 | 16.523 | 56% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 49.8M | 1.14B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.01 | 1.35 | 149% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.08 | 26.74 | 60% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.76 | 67.10 | 31% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.07 | 114.72 | 31% |
| Returns for 10 years | 7.52 | 96.32 | 8% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement