Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFBFX vs PRISX
FFBFX vs PRISX Comparison
Open Charts FFBFX vs PRISX
Emerald Finance & Bking Innovt Fd I
Price$29.16
Change+$0.28 (+0.97%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets52.39M
T. Rowe Price Financial Services
Price$47.63
Change+$0.48 (+1.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.06B
FFBFX vs PRISX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFBFX vs. PRISX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFBFX is a Buy and PRISX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PRISX has more cash in the bank: 2.06B vs. FFBFX (52.4M). FFBFX pays higher dividends than PRISX: FFBFX (2.01) vs PRISX (1.06). FFBFX was incepted earlier than PRISX: FFBFX (15 years) vs PRISX (29 years). FFBFX (1.82) is less costly to investors than PRISX (0.94). FFBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. PRISX (46.90). FFBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than PRISX: FFBFX (2000) vs PRISX (2500). FFBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 38.58 vs. PRISX (21.57). PRISX return over 5 years is better than : 129.92 vs. FFBFX (39.35).
| FFBFX | PRISX | FFBFX / PRISX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.82 | 0.93 | 196% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.82 | 0.94 | 194% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.329 | 11.729 | 88% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 52.4M | 2.06B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.01 | 1.06 | 190% |
| Returns for 1 year | 38.58 | 21.57 | 179% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.25 | 66.39 | 43% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.35 | 129.92 | 30% |
| Returns for 10 years | 9.29 | 122.65 | 8% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers