Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFBFX vs PRISX
FFBFX vs PRISX Comparison
Open Charts FFBFX vs PRISX
Emerald Finance & Bking Innovt Fd I
Price$28.88
Change-$0.19 (-0.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets49.76M
T. Rowe Price Financial Services
Price$47.81
Change+$0.28 (+0.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.08B
FFBFX vs PRISX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFBFX vs. PRISX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFBFX is a Buy and PRISX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PRISX has more cash in the bank: 2.08B vs. FFBFX (49.8M). FFBFX pays higher dividends than PRISX: FFBFX (2.01) vs PRISX (1.06). FFBFX was incepted earlier than PRISX: FFBFX (15 years) vs PRISX (29 years). FFBFX (1.82) is less costly to investors than PRISX (0.94). PRISX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.90 vs. FFBFX (32.00). FFBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than PRISX: FFBFX (2000) vs PRISX (2500). PRISX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.15 vs. FFBFX (16.08). PRISX return over 5 years is better than : 122.24 vs. FFBFX (35.07).
| FFBFX | PRISX | FFBFX / PRISX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.82 | 0.93 | 196% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.82 | 0.94 | 194% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.270 | 12.151 | 76% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 49.8M | 2.08B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.01 | 1.06 | 190% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.08 | 18.15 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.76 | 64.88 | 32% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.07 | 122.24 | 29% |
| Returns for 10 years | 7.52 | 122.27 | 6% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement