Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFBFX vs FSPCX
FFBFX vs FSPCX Comparison
Open Charts FFBFX vs FSPCX
Emerald Finance & Bking Innovt Fd I
Price$28.88
Change-$0.19 (-0.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets49.76M
Fidelity Select Insurance Port
Price$91.79
Change+$1.09 (+1.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.03B
FFBFX vs FSPCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFBFX vs. FSPCX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFBFX is a Buy and FSPCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPCX has more cash in the bank: 1.03B vs. FFBFX (49.8M). FFBFX pays higher dividends than FSPCX: FFBFX (2.01) vs FSPCX (1.03). FFBFX was incepted earlier than FSPCX: FFBFX (15 years) vs FSPCX (40 years). FFBFX (1.82) is less costly to investors than FSPCX (0.69). FSPCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 55.00 vs. FFBFX (32.00). FSPCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FFBFX: FSPCX (0) vs FFBFX (2000). FFBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.08 vs. FSPCX (5.44). FSPCX return over 5 years is better than : 84.40 vs. FFBFX (35.07).
| FFBFX | FSPCX | FFBFX / FSPCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.82 | 0.69 | 264% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.82 | 0.69 | 264% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 40 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.270 | 1.861 | 498% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 49.8M | 1.03B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.01 | 1.03 | 195% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.08 | 5.44 | 295% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.76 | 44.58 | 47% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.07 | 84.40 | 42% |
| Returns for 10 years | 7.52 | 36.95 | 20% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement