Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFBFX vs FSPCX
FFBFX vs FSPCX Comparison
Open Charts FFBFX vs FSPCX
Emerald Finance & Bking Innovt Fd I
Price$30.54
Change+$0.03 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets51.38M
Fidelity Select Insurance Port
Price$93.82
Change+$1.09 (+1.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets895.69M
FFBFX vs FSPCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFBFX vs. FSPCX commentary
Sep 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFBFX is a Hold and FSPCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPCX has more cash in the bank: 896M vs. FFBFX (51.4M). FSPCX pays higher dividends than FFBFX: FSPCX (1.05) vs FFBFX (0.00). FFBFX was incepted earlier than FSPCX: FFBFX (16 years) vs FSPCX (40 years). FFBFX (1.82) is less costly to investors than FSPCX (0.69). FSPCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 55.00 vs. FFBFX (32.00). FSPCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FFBFX: FSPCX (0) vs FFBFX (2000). FFBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.49 vs. FSPCX (-1.96). FSPCX return over 5 years is better than : 96.00 vs. FFBFX (38.50).
| FFBFX | FSPCX | FFBFX / FSPCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.82 | 0.69 | 264% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.82 | 0.69 | 264% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 40 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.551 | 2.904 | 536% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 51.4M | 896M | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.05 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.49 | -1.96 | -1,200% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.18 | 51.00 | 83% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.50 | 96.00 | 40% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.05 | 51.13 | 31% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement