Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFBFX vs FSPCX
FFBFX vs FSPCX Comparison
Open Charts FFBFX vs FSPCX
Emerald Finance & Bking Innovt Fd I
Price$29.16
Change+$0.28 (+0.97%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets52.39M
Fidelity Select Insurance Port
Price$93.19
Change+$1.16 (+1.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.03B
FFBFX vs FSPCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFBFX vs. FSPCX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFBFX is a Buy and FSPCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPCX has more cash in the bank: 1.03B vs. FFBFX (52.4M). FFBFX pays higher dividends than FSPCX: FFBFX (2.01) vs FSPCX (1.03). FFBFX was incepted earlier than FSPCX: FFBFX (15 years) vs FSPCX (40 years). FFBFX (1.82) is less costly to investors than FSPCX (0.69). FFBFX (56.00) and FSPCX (55.00) have comparable annual turnover. FSPCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FFBFX: FSPCX (0) vs FFBFX (2000). FFBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 38.58 vs. FSPCX (10.85). FSPCX return over 5 years is better than : 99.73 vs. FFBFX (39.35).
| FFBFX | FSPCX | FFBFX / FSPCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.82 | 0.69 | 264% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.82 | 0.69 | 264% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 40 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.329 | 3.414 | 303% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 52.4M | 1.03B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.01 | 1.03 | 195% |
| Returns for 1 year | 38.58 | 10.85 | 355% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.25 | 44.17 | 64% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.35 | 99.73 | 39% |
| Returns for 10 years | 9.29 | 42.71 | 22% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement