Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFBFX vs FSLBX
FFBFX vs FSLBX Comparison
Open Charts FFBFX vs FSLBX
Emerald Finance & Bking Innovt Fd I
Price$28.91
Change-$0.32 (-1.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets49.94M
Fidelity Select Brokerage & Inv Mgmt
Price$198.69
Change-$2.68 (-1.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.47B
FFBFX vs FSLBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFBFX vs. FSLBX commentary
Aug 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFBFX is a Buy and FSLBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSLBX has more cash in the bank: 1.47B vs. FFBFX (49.9M). FSLBX pays higher dividends than FFBFX: FSLBX (0.62) vs FFBFX (0.00). FFBFX was incepted earlier than FSLBX: FFBFX (15 years) vs FSLBX (40 years). FFBFX (1.82) is less costly to investors than FSLBX (0.69). FFBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FSLBX (16.00). FSLBX has a lower initial minimum investment than FFBFX: FSLBX (0) vs FFBFX (2000). FSLBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 30.72 vs. FFBFX (19.56). FSLBX return over 5 years is better than : 160.43 vs. FFBFX (27.70).
| FFBFX | FSLBX | FFBFX / FSLBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.82 | 0.69 | 264% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.82 | 0.69 | 264% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 40 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.383 | 10.888 | 86% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 49.9M | 1.47B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.62 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.56 | 30.72 | 64% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.19 | 85.19 | 13% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.70 | 160.43 | 17% |
| Returns for 10 years | 9.74 | 205.48 | 5% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement