Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFBFX vs FIDSX
FFBFX vs FIDSX Comparison
Open Charts FFBFX vs FIDSX
Emerald Finance & Bking Innovt Fd I
Price$28.23
Change+$0.12 (+0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets47.43M
Fidelity Select Financials Port
Price$15.59
Change+$0.13 (+0.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.07B
FFBFX vs FIDSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFBFX vs. FIDSX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFBFX is a Hold and FIDSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIDSX has more cash in the bank: 1.07B vs. FFBFX (47.4M). FIDSX pays higher dividends than FFBFX: FIDSX (1.32) vs FFBFX (0.00). FFBFX was incepted earlier than FIDSX: FFBFX (16 years) vs FIDSX (44 years). FFBFX (1.89) is less costly to investors than FIDSX (0.69). FIDSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. FFBFX (32.00). FIDSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FFBFX: FIDSX (0) vs FFBFX (2000). FFBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.53 vs. FIDSX (3.26). FIDSX return over 5 years is better than : 104.06 vs. FFBFX (14.62).
| FFBFX | FIDSX | FFBFX / FIDSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 0.69 | 274% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 0.69 | 274% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 44 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.810 | 4.780 | 142% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 47.4M | 1.07B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.32 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.53 | 3.26 | 170% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.18 | 49.47 | 61% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.62 | 104.06 | 14% |
| Returns for 10 years | 3.68 | 103.66 | 4% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement