Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFBFX vs FIDSX
FFBFX vs FIDSX Comparison
Open Charts FFBFX vs FIDSX
Emerald Finance & Bking Innovt Fd I
Price$28.82
Change-$0.11 (-0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets48.07M
Fidelity Select Financials Port
Price$16.03
Change-$0.03 (-0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.02B
FFBFX vs FIDSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFBFX vs. FIDSX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFBFX is a StrongBuy and FIDSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIDSX has more cash in the bank: 1.02B vs. FFBFX (48.1M). FIDSX pays higher dividends than FFBFX: FIDSX (1.33) vs FFBFX (0.00). FFBFX was incepted earlier than FIDSX: FFBFX (16 years) vs FIDSX (44 years). FFBFX (1.89) is less costly to investors than FIDSX (0.69). FIDSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. FFBFX (32.00). FIDSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FFBFX: FIDSX (0) vs FFBFX (2000). FFBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.05 vs. FIDSX (-1.77). FIDSX return over 5 years is better than : 78.21 vs. FFBFX (2.62).
| FFBFX | FIDSX | FFBFX / FIDSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 0.69 | 274% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 0.69 | 274% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 44 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.459 | 7.939 | 119% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 48.1M | 1.02B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.33 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.05 | -1.77 | -59% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.42 | 42.61 | 83% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.62 | 78.21 | 3% |
| Returns for 10 years | 0.24 | 101.63 | 0% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement