Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFBFX vs FIDSX
FFBFX vs FIDSX Comparison
Open Charts FFBFX vs FIDSX
Emerald Finance & Bking Innovt Fd I
Price$30.54
Change+$0.03 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets51.38M
Fidelity Select Financials Port
Price$16.31
Change+$0.12 (+0.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.09B
FFBFX vs FIDSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFBFX vs. FIDSX commentary
Sep 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFBFX is a Hold and FIDSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIDSX has more cash in the bank: 1.09B vs. FFBFX (51.4M). FIDSX pays higher dividends than FFBFX: FIDSX (1.31) vs FFBFX (0.00). FFBFX was incepted earlier than FIDSX: FFBFX (16 years) vs FIDSX (44 years). FFBFX (1.82) is less costly to investors than FIDSX (0.69). FIDSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. FFBFX (32.00). FIDSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FFBFX: FIDSX (0) vs FFBFX (2000). FFBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.49 vs. FIDSX (14.96). FIDSX return over 5 years is better than : 130.55 vs. FFBFX (38.50).
| FFBFX | FIDSX | FFBFX / FIDSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.82 | 0.69 | 264% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.82 | 0.69 | 264% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 44 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.551 | 8.812 | 176% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 51.4M | 1.09B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.31 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.49 | 14.96 | 157% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.18 | 66.70 | 63% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.50 | 130.55 | 29% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.05 | 122.81 | 13% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement