Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFBFX vs FIDSX
FFBFX vs FIDSX Comparison
Open Charts FFBFX vs FIDSX
Emerald Finance & Bking Innovt Fd I
Price$29.67
Change-$0.44 (-1.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets47.35M
Fidelity Select Financials Port
Price$16.04
Change+$0.12 (+0.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.05B
FFBFX vs FIDSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFBFX vs. FIDSX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFBFX is a Buy and FIDSX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIDSX has more cash in the bank: 1.05B vs. FFBFX (47.4M). FIDSX pays higher dividends than FFBFX: FIDSX (1.64) vs FFBFX (0.00). FFBFX was incepted earlier than FIDSX: FFBFX (16 years) vs FIDSX (44 years). FFBFX (1.89) is less costly to investors than FIDSX (0.69). FIDSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. FFBFX (32.00). FIDSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FFBFX: FIDSX (0) vs FFBFX (2000). FFBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.60 vs. FIDSX (4.73). FIDSX return over 5 years is better than : 65.20 vs. FFBFX (-24.16).
| FFBFX | FIDSX | FFBFX / FIDSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 0.69 | 274% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 0.69 | 274% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 44 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.203 | 1.252 | 16% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 47.4M | 1.05B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.64 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.60 | 4.73 | 203% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.71 | 44.25 | 90% |
| Returns for 5 years | -24.16 | 65.20 | -37% |
| Returns for 10 years | 23.23 | 144.94 | 16% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement