Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFBFX vs FIDSX
FFBFX vs FIDSX Comparison
Open Charts FFBFX vs FIDSX
Emerald Finance & Bking Innovt Fd I
Price$28.89
Change+$0.06 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets47.98M
Fidelity Select Financials Port
Price$16.15
Change+$0.10 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1B
FFBFX vs FIDSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFBFX vs. FIDSX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFBFX is a Buy and FIDSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIDSX has more cash in the bank: 1B vs. FFBFX (48M). FIDSX pays higher dividends than FFBFX: FIDSX (1.37) vs FFBFX (0.00). FFBFX was incepted earlier than FIDSX: FFBFX (16 years) vs FIDSX (44 years). FFBFX (1.89) is less costly to investors than FIDSX (0.69). FIDSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. FFBFX (32.00). FIDSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FFBFX: FIDSX (0) vs FFBFX (2000). FFBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.23 vs. FIDSX (0.66). FIDSX return over 5 years is better than : 90.59 vs. FFBFX (11.67).
| FFBFX | FIDSX | FFBFX / FIDSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 0.69 | 274% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 0.69 | 274% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 44 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.308 | 7.871 | 118% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 48M | 1B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.37 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.23 | 0.66 | 187% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.70 | 42.40 | 72% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.67 | 90.59 | 13% |
| Returns for 10 years | 2.45 | 108.31 | 2% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement