Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFBFX vs FIDSX
FFBFX vs FIDSX Comparison
Open Charts FFBFX vs FIDSX
Emerald Finance & Bking Innovt Fd I
Price$28.88
Change-$0.19 (-0.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets49.76M
Fidelity Select Financials Port
Price$16.13
Change+$0.11 (+0.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.09B
FFBFX vs FIDSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFBFX vs. FIDSX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFBFX is a Buy and FIDSX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIDSX has more cash in the bank: 1.09B vs. FFBFX (49.8M). FFBFX pays higher dividends than FIDSX: FFBFX (2.01) vs FIDSX (1.36). FFBFX was incepted earlier than FIDSX: FFBFX (15 years) vs FIDSX (44 years). FFBFX (1.82) is less costly to investors than FIDSX (0.69). FIDSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. FFBFX (32.00). FIDSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FFBFX: FIDSX (0) vs FFBFX (2000). FIDSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.52 vs. FFBFX (16.08). FIDSX return over 5 years is better than : 120.57 vs. FFBFX (35.07).
| FFBFX | FIDSX | FFBFX / FIDSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.82 | 0.69 | 264% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.82 | 0.69 | 264% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 44 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.270 | 8.409 | 110% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 49.8M | 1.09B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.01 | 1.36 | 148% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.08 | 18.52 | 87% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.76 | 56.64 | 37% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.07 | 120.57 | 29% |
| Returns for 10 years | 7.52 | 97.49 | 8% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement