Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFBFX vs FIDCX
FFBFX vs FIDCX Comparison
Open Charts FFBFX vs FIDCX
Emerald Finance & Bking Innovt Fd I
Price$29.67
Change-$0.44 (-1.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets47.35M
JHancock Financial Industries C
Price$10.42
Change-$5.22 (-33.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets284.71M
FFBFX vs FIDCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFBFX vs. FIDCX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFBFX is a Buy and FIDCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIDCX has more cash in the bank: 285M vs. FFBFX (47.4M). FIDCX pays higher dividends than FFBFX: FIDCX (0.26) vs FFBFX (0.00). FFBFX was incepted earlier than FIDCX: FFBFX (16 years) vs FIDCX (27 years). FIDCX (1.98) and FFBFX (1.89) have similar cost to investors . FIDCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 63.00 vs. FFBFX (32.00). FIDCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FFBFX: FIDCX (1000) vs FFBFX (2000). FFBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.60 vs. FIDCX (-34.21). FFBFX return over 5 years is better than : -24.16 vs. FIDCX (-37.22).
| FFBFX | FIDCX | FFBFX / FIDCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 1.97 | 96% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 1.98 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.203 | 1.067 | 19% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 47.4M | 285M | 17% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.26 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.60 | -34.21 | -28% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.71 | -20.66 | -192% |
| Returns for 5 years | -24.16 | -37.22 | 65% |
| Returns for 10 years | 23.23 | -19.75 | -118% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement