Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFBFX vs FIDCX
FFBFX vs FIDCX Comparison
Open Charts FFBFX vs FIDCX
Emerald Finance & Bking Innovt Fd I
Price$28.82
Change-$0.11 (-0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets48.07M
JHancock Financial Industries C
Price$15.86
Change-$0.01 (-0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets292.31M
FFBFX vs FIDCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFBFX vs. FIDCX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFBFX is a StrongBuy and FIDCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIDCX has more cash in the bank: 292M vs. FFBFX (48.1M). FIDCX pays higher dividends than FFBFX: FIDCX (0.52) vs FFBFX (0.00). FFBFX was incepted earlier than FIDCX: FFBFX (16 years) vs FIDCX (27 years). FIDCX (1.98) and FFBFX (1.89) have similar cost to investors . FIDCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. FFBFX (32.00). FIDCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FFBFX: FIDCX (1000) vs FFBFX (2000). FFBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.05 vs. FIDCX (-10.45). FFBFX return over 5 years is better than : 2.62 vs. FIDCX (-2.60).
| FFBFX | FIDCX | FFBFX / FIDCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 1.97 | 96% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 1.98 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.459 | 5.239 | 181% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 48.1M | 292M | 16% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.52 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.05 | -10.45 | -10% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.42 | 6.68 | 530% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.62 | -2.60 | -101% |
| Returns for 10 years | 0.24 | 1.25 | 19% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement