Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFBFX vs FIDCX
FFBFX vs FIDCX Comparison
Open Charts FFBFX vs FIDCX
Emerald Finance & Bking Innovt Fd I
Price$28.23
Change+$0.12 (+0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets47.43M
JHancock Financial Industries C
Price$15.21
Change+$0.13 (+0.86%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets284.46M
FFBFX vs FIDCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFBFX vs. FIDCX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFBFX is a Hold and FIDCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIDCX has more cash in the bank: 284M vs. FFBFX (47.4M). FIDCX pays higher dividends than FFBFX: FIDCX (0.52) vs FFBFX (0.00). FFBFX was incepted earlier than FIDCX: FFBFX (16 years) vs FIDCX (27 years). FIDCX (1.98) and FFBFX (1.89) have similar cost to investors . FIDCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. FFBFX (32.00). FIDCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FFBFX: FIDCX (1000) vs FFBFX (2000). FFBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.53 vs. FIDCX (-7.14). FFBFX return over 5 years is better than : 14.62 vs. FIDCX (4.76).
| FFBFX | FIDCX | FFBFX / FIDCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 1.97 | 96% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 1.98 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.810 | 0.862 | 790% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 47.4M | 284M | 17% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.52 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.53 | -7.14 | -77% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.18 | 8.62 | 350% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.62 | 4.76 | 307% |
| Returns for 10 years | 3.68 | 0.74 | 500% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement