Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFBFX vs FIDAX
FFBFX vs FIDAX Comparison
Open Charts FFBFX vs FIDAX
Emerald Finance & Bking Innovt Fd I
Price$28.01
Change-$0.88 (-3.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets48.03M
JHancock Financial Industries A
Price$18.93
Change-$0.27 (-1.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets290.74M
FFBFX vs FIDAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFBFX vs. FIDAX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFBFX is a Buy and FIDAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIDAX has more cash in the bank: 291M vs. FFBFX (48M). FIDAX pays higher dividends than FFBFX: FIDAX (1.11) vs FFBFX (0.00). FFBFX was incepted earlier than FIDAX: FFBFX (16 years) vs FIDAX (30 years). FFBFX (1.89) is less costly to investors than FIDAX (1.28). FIDAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. FFBFX (32.00). FIDAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FFBFX: FIDAX (1000) vs FFBFX (2000). FFBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.23 vs. FIDAX (-5.95). FFBFX return over 5 years is better than : 11.67 vs. FIDAX (10.48).
| FFBFX | FIDAX | FFBFX / FIDAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 1.27 | 149% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 1.28 | 148% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.308 | 6.312 | 147% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 48M | 291M | 16% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.11 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.23 | -5.95 | -21% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.70 | 12.60 | 244% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.67 | 10.48 | 111% |
| Returns for 10 years | 2.45 | 20.14 | 12% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement