Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFBFX vs FIDAX
FFBFX vs FIDAX Comparison
Open Charts FFBFX vs FIDAX
Emerald Finance & Bking Innovt Fd I
Price$28.23
Change+$0.12 (+0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets47.43M
JHancock Financial Industries A
Price$18.33
Change+$0.16 (+0.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets284.46M
FFBFX vs FIDAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFBFX vs. FIDAX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFBFX is a Hold and FIDAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIDAX has more cash in the bank: 284M vs. FFBFX (47.4M). FIDAX pays higher dividends than FFBFX: FIDAX (1.08) vs FFBFX (0.00). FFBFX was incepted earlier than FIDAX: FFBFX (16 years) vs FIDAX (30 years). FFBFX (1.89) is less costly to investors than FIDAX (1.28). FIDAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. FFBFX (32.00). FIDAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FFBFX: FIDAX (1000) vs FFBFX (2000). FFBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.53 vs. FIDAX (-4.91). FFBFX (14.62) and FIDAX (14.45) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FFBFX | FIDAX | FFBFX / FIDAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 1.27 | 149% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 1.28 | 148% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.810 | 1.495 | 456% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 47.4M | 284M | 17% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.08 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.53 | -4.91 | -113% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.18 | 13.98 | 216% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.62 | 14.45 | 101% |
| Returns for 10 years | 3.68 | 15.76 | 23% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement