Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFBFX vs FIDAX
FFBFX vs FIDAX Comparison
Open Charts FFBFX vs FIDAX
Emerald Finance & Bking Innovt Fd I
Price$30.64
Change+$0.09 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets49.88M
JHancock Financial Industries A
Price$13.92
Change+$0.06 (+0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets295.39M
FFBFX vs FIDAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFBFX vs. FIDAX commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFBFX is a Hold and FIDAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIDAX has more cash in the bank: 295M vs. FFBFX (49.9M). FIDAX pays higher dividends than FFBFX: FIDAX (1.08) vs FFBFX (0.00). FFBFX was incepted earlier than FIDAX: FFBFX (16 years) vs FIDAX (30 years). FFBFX (1.89) is less costly to investors than FIDAX (1.28). FIDAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. FFBFX (32.00). FIDAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FFBFX: FIDAX (1000) vs FFBFX (2000). FFBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.58 vs. FIDAX (-23.89). FFBFX return over 5 years is better than : -6.11 vs. FIDAX (-20.47).
| FFBFX | FIDAX | FFBFX / FIDAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 1.27 | 149% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 1.28 | 148% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.929 | -22.924 | -69% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 49.9M | 295M | 17% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.08 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.58 | -23.89 | -61% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.63 | -3.41 | -1,633% |
| Returns for 5 years | -6.11 | -20.47 | 30% |
| Returns for 10 years | 9.84 | -12.24 | -80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers