FFBC
Price
$25.80
Change
-$0.03 (-0.12%)
Updated
Dec 24 closing price
Capitalization
2.54B
28 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
WSFS
Price
$57.11
Change
+$0.06 (+0.11%)
Updated
Dec 24 closing price
Capitalization
3.12B
28 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FFBC vs WSFS

Header iconFFBC vs WSFS Comparison
Open Charts FFBC vs WSFSBanner chart's image
First Financial Ban
Price$25.80
Change-$0.03 (-0.12%)
Volume$266.89K
Capitalization2.54B
WSFS Financial
Price$57.11
Change+$0.06 (+0.11%)
Volume$172.87K
Capitalization3.12B
FFBC vs WSFS Comparison Chart in %
FFBC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WSFS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FFBC vs. WSFS commentary
Dec 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFBC is a Buy and WSFS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 26, 2025
Stock price -- (FFBC: $25.80 vs. WSFS: $57.11)
Brand notoriety: FFBC and WSFS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FFBC: 45% vs. WSFS: 44%
Market capitalization -- FFBC: $2.54B vs. WSFS: $3.12B
FFBC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $2.54B. WSFS’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $3.12B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $171.46B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.64B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FFBC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileWSFS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FFBC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • WSFS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FFBC is a better buy in the long-term than WSFS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FFBC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WSFS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FFBC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • WSFS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FFBC is a better buy in the short-term than WSFS.

Price Growth

FFBC (@Regional Banks) experienced а -3.15% price change this week, while WSFS (@Regional Banks) price change was -1.40% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.44%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.56%.

Reported Earning Dates

FFBC is expected to report earnings on Jan 22, 2026.

WSFS is expected to report earnings on Jan 22, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.01% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WSFS($3.12B) has a higher market cap than FFBC($2.54B). WSFS has higher P/E ratio than FFBC: WSFS (11.82) vs FFBC (9.56). WSFS YTD gains are higher at: 8.794 vs. FFBC (-1.266). WSFS has more cash in the bank: 1.32B vs. FFBC (210M). WSFS has less debt than FFBC: WSFS (255M) vs FFBC (817M). WSFS has higher revenues than FFBC: WSFS (1.06B) vs FFBC (885M).
FFBCWSFSFFBC / WSFS
Capitalization2.54B3.12B81%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-1.2668.794-14%
P/E Ratio9.5611.8281%
Revenue885M1.06B84%
Total Cash210M1.32B16%
Total Debt817M255M320%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FFBC vs WSFS: Fundamental Ratings
FFBC
WSFS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
597
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
37
Fair valued
47
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3152
SMR RATING
1..100
1514
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5352
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7554
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FFBC's Valuation (37) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as WSFS (47) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that FFBC’s stock grew similarly to WSFS’s over the last 12 months.

FFBC's Profit vs Risk Rating (31) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as WSFS (52) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that FFBC’s stock grew similarly to WSFS’s over the last 12 months.

WSFS's SMR Rating (14) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as FFBC (15) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that WSFS’s stock grew similarly to FFBC’s over the last 12 months.

WSFS's Price Growth Rating (52) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as FFBC (53) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that WSFS’s stock grew similarly to FFBC’s over the last 12 months.

WSFS's P/E Growth Rating (54) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as FFBC (75) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that WSFS’s stock grew similarly to FFBC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FFBCWSFS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
46%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FFBC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WSFS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BRUDX16.030.06
+0.38%
MFS Blended Research Value Equity A
JDVFX25.110.08
+0.32%
JHancock Disciplined Value R4
LMRNX34.430.07
+0.20%
1919 Socially Responsive Balanced I
JGRQX18.110.03
+0.17%
JPMorgan Small Cap Growth R3
GLNBX21.06-0.01
-0.05%
MFS Global New Discovery B

FFBC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FFBC has been closely correlated with UCB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FFBC jumps, then UCB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FFBC
1D Price
Change %
FFBC100%
-0.12%
UCB - FFBC
87%
Closely correlated
+0.25%
PFS - FFBC
86%
Closely correlated
+0.20%
COLB - FFBC
86%
Closely correlated
+0.03%
HOPE - FFBC
86%
Closely correlated
+0.09%
WSFS - FFBC
86%
Closely correlated
+0.11%
More

WSFS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WSFS has been closely correlated with UCB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WSFS jumps, then UCB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WSFS
1D Price
Change %
WSFS100%
+0.11%
UCB - WSFS
91%
Closely correlated
+0.25%
STBA - WSFS
90%
Closely correlated
-0.34%
FNB - WSFS
90%
Closely correlated
+0.17%
TRMK - WSFS
89%
Closely correlated
-0.15%
UBSI - WSFS
89%
Closely correlated
+0.08%
More