FFBC
Price
$26.83
Change
-$0.15 (-0.56%)
Updated
Dec 12, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.66B
41 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
UNTN
Price
$21.83
Change
+$0.33 (+1.53%)
Updated
Dec 10 closing price
Capitalization
16.16M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FFBC vs UNTN

Header iconFFBC vs UNTN Comparison
Open Charts FFBC vs UNTNBanner chart's image
First Financial Ban
Price$26.83
Change-$0.15 (-0.56%)
Volume$13.99K
Capitalization2.66B
United Tennessee Bankshares
Price$21.83
Change+$0.33 (+1.53%)
Volume$200
Capitalization16.16M
FFBC vs UNTN Comparison Chart in %
FFBC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
UNTN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FFBC vs. UNTN commentary
Dec 13, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFBC is a StrongBuy and UNTN is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 13, 2025
Stock price -- (FFBC: $26.98 vs. UNTN: $21.83)
Brand notoriety: FFBC and UNTN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FFBC: 97% vs. UNTN: 59%
Market capitalization -- FFBC: $2.66B vs. UNTN: $16.16M
FFBC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $2.66B. UNTN’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $16.16M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $171.36B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.41B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FFBC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileUNTN’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FFBC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • UNTN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FFBC is a better buy in the long-term than UNTN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FFBC’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UNTN’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FFBC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • UNTN’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FFBC is a better buy in the short-term than UNTN.

Price Growth

FFBC (@Regional Banks) experienced а +4.53% price change this week, while UNTN (@Regional Banks) price change was +1.55% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.66%.

Reported Earning Dates

FFBC is expected to report earnings on Jan 22, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.16% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFBC($2.66B) has a higher market cap than UNTN($16.2M). FFBC (9.99) and UNTN (9.66) have similar P/E ratio . UNTN YTD gains are higher at: 39.345 vs. FFBC (3.249). FFBC has more cash in the bank: 210M vs. UNTN (12.8M). UNTN has less debt than FFBC: UNTN (1M) vs FFBC (1.03B). FFBC has higher revenues than UNTN: FFBC (852M) vs UNTN (6.94M).
FFBCUNTNFFBC / UNTN
Capitalization2.66B16.2M16,407%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD3.24939.3458%
P/E Ratio9.999.66103%
Revenue852M6.94M12,277%
Total Cash210M12.8M1,641%
Total Debt1.03B1M103,000%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FFBC vs UNTN: Fundamental Ratings
FFBC
UNTN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1736
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
41
Fair valued
82
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2762
SMR RATING
1..100
1575
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4845
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7338
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FFBC's Valuation (41) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UNTN (82) in the null industry. This means that FFBC’s stock grew somewhat faster than UNTN’s over the last 12 months.

FFBC's Profit vs Risk Rating (27) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UNTN (62) in the null industry. This means that FFBC’s stock grew somewhat faster than UNTN’s over the last 12 months.

FFBC's SMR Rating (15) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UNTN (75) in the null industry. This means that FFBC’s stock grew somewhat faster than UNTN’s over the last 12 months.

UNTN's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as FFBC (48) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that UNTN’s stock grew similarly to FFBC’s over the last 12 months.

UNTN's P/E Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FFBC (73) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that UNTN’s stock grew somewhat faster than FFBC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FFBCUNTN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
26%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
17%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
31%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
23%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
22%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
21%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
27%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
61%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
27%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
35%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FFBC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
UNTN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CSRYX41.960.37
+0.89%
Columbia Select Large Cap Value Inst3
SECIX50.690.41
+0.82%
NAA Large Cap Value A
MSIQX12.15N/A
N/A
Morgan Stanley Inst International Eq I
NMFIX14.03N/A
N/A
Northern Multi-Mgr Glbl Listed Infra
CIUEX13.86N/A
N/A
Six Circles International Uncon Eq

UNTN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UNTN has been loosely correlated with CZBC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UNTN jumps, then CZBC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UNTN
1D Price
Change %
UNTN100%
N/A
CZBC - UNTN
41%
Loosely correlated
N/A
KPCUF - UNTN
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JFWV - UNTN
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BYFC - UNTN
20%
Poorly correlated
-2.15%
FFDF - UNTN
20%
Poorly correlated
-2.68%
More