FFBC
Price
$30.07
Change
-$0.05 (-0.17%)
Updated
Feb 5, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.14B
69 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
HFWA
Price
$27.79
Change
+$0.68 (+2.51%)
Updated
Feb 5, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
943.85M
69 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FFBC vs HFWA

Header iconFFBC vs HFWA Comparison
Open Charts FFBC vs HFWABanner chart's image
First Financial Ban
Price$30.07
Change-$0.05 (-0.17%)
Volume$24.37K
Capitalization3.14B
Heritage Financial
Price$27.79
Change+$0.68 (+2.51%)
Volume$4K
Capitalization943.85M
FFBC vs HFWA Comparison Chart in %
FFBC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
HFWA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FFBC vs. HFWA commentary
Feb 06, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFBC is a StrongBuy and HFWA is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 06, 2026
Stock price -- (FFBC: $30.12 vs. HFWA: $27.11)
Brand notoriety: FFBC and HFWA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FFBC: 74% vs. HFWA: 121%
Market capitalization -- FFBC: $3.14B vs. HFWA: $943.85M
FFBC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $3.14B. HFWA’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $943.85M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $161.58B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $9.38B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FFBC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileHFWA’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FFBC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • HFWA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FFBC is a better buy in the long-term than HFWA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FFBC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HFWA’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FFBC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • HFWA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HFWA is a better buy in the short-term than FFBC.

Price Growth

FFBC (@Regional Banks) experienced а +10.74% price change this week, while HFWA (@Regional Banks) price change was +7.58% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.36%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.80%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.28%.

Reported Earning Dates

FFBC is expected to report earnings on Apr 16, 2026.

HFWA is expected to report earnings on Apr 16, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.36% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFBC($3.14B) has a higher market cap than HFWA($944M). HFWA has higher P/E ratio than FFBC: HFWA (14.18) vs FFBC (11.30). FFBC YTD gains are higher at: 20.384 vs. HFWA (15.698). FFBC has more cash in the bank: 210M vs. HFWA (74M). HFWA has less debt than FFBC: HFWA (160M) vs FFBC (817M). FFBC has higher revenues than HFWA: FFBC (885M) vs HFWA (237M).
FFBCHFWAFFBC / HFWA
Capitalization3.14B944M333%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD20.38415.698130%
P/E Ratio11.3014.1880%
Revenue885M237M373%
Total Cash210M74M284%
Total Debt817M160M511%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FFBC vs HFWA: Fundamental Ratings
FFBC
HFWA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
579
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
49
Fair valued
42
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3073
SMR RATING
1..100
1531
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4345
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5785
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HFWA's Valuation (42) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FFBC (49). This means that HFWA’s stock grew similarly to FFBC’s over the last 12 months.

FFBC's Profit vs Risk Rating (30) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HFWA (73). This means that FFBC’s stock grew somewhat faster than HFWA’s over the last 12 months.

FFBC's SMR Rating (15) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HFWA (31). This means that FFBC’s stock grew similarly to HFWA’s over the last 12 months.

FFBC's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HFWA (45). This means that FFBC’s stock grew similarly to HFWA’s over the last 12 months.

FFBC's P/E Growth Rating (57) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HFWA (85). This means that FFBC’s stock grew similarly to HFWA’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FFBCHFWA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FFBC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
HFWA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PVCMX12.440.08
+0.65%
Palm Valley Capital Investor
FITGX23.55N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor International Growth M
IEGCX20.81-0.10
-0.48%
Invesco International Small Company C
HCMPX20.92-0.14
-0.66%
HCM Sector Plus Investor
CYPIX78.09-0.82
-1.04%
ProFunds Consumer Disctnry Ultra Sec Inv

FFBC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FFBC has been closely correlated with UBSI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 92% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FFBC jumps, then UBSI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FFBC
1D Price
Change %
FFBC100%
+2.24%
UBSI - FFBC
92%
Closely correlated
+1.66%
FNB - FFBC
91%
Closely correlated
+1.64%
COLB - FFBC
91%
Closely correlated
+2.30%
STBA - FFBC
91%
Closely correlated
+1.01%
TCBK - FFBC
90%
Closely correlated
+0.52%
More

HFWA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HFWA has been closely correlated with HOPE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HFWA jumps, then HOPE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HFWA
1D Price
Change %
HFWA100%
+2.22%
HOPE - HFWA
90%
Closely correlated
+2.84%
STBA - HFWA
90%
Closely correlated
+1.01%
FFBC - HFWA
89%
Closely correlated
+2.24%
NBTB - HFWA
89%
Closely correlated
+1.79%
UBSI - HFWA
89%
Closely correlated
+1.66%
More