FFBC
Price
$25.80
Change
-$0.03 (-0.12%)
Updated
Dec 24 closing price
Capitalization
2.54B
27 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FULT
Price
$20.19
Change
+$0.05 (+0.25%)
Updated
Dec 24 closing price
Capitalization
3.63B
25 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FFBC vs FULT

Header iconFFBC vs FULT Comparison
Open Charts FFBC vs FULTBanner chart's image
First Financial Ban
Price$25.80
Change-$0.03 (-0.12%)
Volume$266.89K
Capitalization2.54B
Fulton Financial
Price$20.19
Change+$0.05 (+0.25%)
Volume$1.36M
Capitalization3.63B
FFBC vs FULT Comparison Chart in %
FFBC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FULT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FFBC vs. FULT commentary
Dec 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFBC is a Buy and FULT is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 26, 2025
Stock price -- (FFBC: $25.80 vs. FULT: $20.19)
Brand notoriety: FFBC and FULT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FFBC: 45% vs. FULT: 77%
Market capitalization -- FFBC: $2.54B vs. FULT: $3.63B
FFBC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $2.54B. FULT’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $3.63B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $171.46B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.65B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FFBC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFULT’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FFBC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FULT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FULT is a better buy in the long-term than FFBC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FFBC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FULT’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FFBC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • FULT’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FULT is a better buy in the short-term than FFBC.

Price Growth

FFBC (@Regional Banks) experienced а -3.15% price change this week, while FULT (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.88% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.44%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.56%.

Reported Earning Dates

FFBC is expected to report earnings on Jan 22, 2026.

FULT is expected to report earnings on Jan 20, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.01% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FULT($3.63B) has a higher market cap than FFBC($2.54B). FULT has higher P/E ratio than FFBC: FULT (10.57) vs FFBC (9.56). FULT YTD gains are higher at: 7.881 vs. FFBC (-1.266). FULT has more cash in the bank: 362M vs. FFBC (210M). FFBC has less debt than FULT: FFBC (817M) vs FULT (1.47B). FULT has higher revenues than FFBC: FULT (1.3B) vs FFBC (885M).
FFBCFULTFFBC / FULT
Capitalization2.54B3.63B70%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-1.2667.881-16%
P/E Ratio9.5610.5790%
Revenue885M1.3B68%
Total Cash210M362M58%
Total Debt817M1.47B56%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FFBC vs FULT: Fundamental Ratings
FFBC
FULT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6219
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
36
Fair valued
32
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3138
SMR RATING
1..100
1512
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5346
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7570
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FULT's Valuation (32) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FFBC (36). This means that FULT’s stock grew similarly to FFBC’s over the last 12 months.

FFBC's Profit vs Risk Rating (31) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FULT (38). This means that FFBC’s stock grew similarly to FULT’s over the last 12 months.

FULT's SMR Rating (12) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FFBC (15). This means that FULT’s stock grew similarly to FFBC’s over the last 12 months.

FULT's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FFBC (53). This means that FULT’s stock grew similarly to FFBC’s over the last 12 months.

FULT's P/E Growth Rating (70) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FFBC (75). This means that FULT’s stock grew similarly to FFBC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FFBCFULT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
52%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
59%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 29 days ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
41%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FFBC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FULT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BRUHX15.860.06
+0.38%
MFS Blended Research Value Equity I
JVLAX26.550.09
+0.34%
JHancock Disciplined Value A
KESGX17.040.05
+0.29%
Kennedy Capital ESG SMID Cap I
BMDIX19.470.05
+0.26%
Baird Mid Cap Growth Institutional
OGGFX21.570.03
+0.14%
JPMorgan Small Cap Growth I

FFBC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FFBC has been closely correlated with UCB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FFBC jumps, then UCB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FFBC
1D Price
Change %
FFBC100%
-0.12%
UCB - FFBC
87%
Closely correlated
+0.25%
PFS - FFBC
86%
Closely correlated
+0.20%
COLB - FFBC
86%
Closely correlated
+0.03%
WSFS - FFBC
86%
Closely correlated
+0.11%
FNB - FFBC
86%
Closely correlated
+0.17%
More

FULT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FULT has been closely correlated with FNB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FULT jumps, then FNB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FULT
1D Price
Change %
FULT100%
+0.25%
FNB - FULT
85%
Closely correlated
+0.17%
ASB - FULT
83%
Closely correlated
+0.30%
HWC - FULT
83%
Closely correlated
-0.46%
UCB - FULT
83%
Closely correlated
+0.25%
FFBC - FULT
83%
Closely correlated
-0.12%
More