FFBC
Price
$30.12
Change
+$0.66 (+2.24%)
Updated
Feb 4 closing price
Capitalization
3.15B
70 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FULT
Price
$22.06
Change
+$0.47 (+2.18%)
Updated
Feb 4 closing price
Capitalization
3.97B
75 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FFBC vs FULT

Header iconFFBC vs FULT Comparison
Open Charts FFBC vs FULTBanner chart's image
First Financial Ban
Price$30.12
Change+$0.66 (+2.24%)
Volume$733.95K
Capitalization3.15B
Fulton Financial
Price$22.06
Change+$0.47 (+2.18%)
Volume$2.55M
Capitalization3.97B
FFBC vs FULT Comparison Chart in %
FFBC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FULT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FFBC vs. FULT commentary
Feb 05, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFBC is a StrongBuy and FULT is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 05, 2026
Stock price -- (FFBC: $30.12 vs. FULT: $22.06)
Brand notoriety: FFBC and FULT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FFBC: 74% vs. FULT: 134%
Market capitalization -- FFBC: $3.15B vs. FULT: $3.97B
FFBC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $3.15B. FULT’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $3.97B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $162.2B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $9.38B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FFBC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFULT’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FFBC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FULT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FFBC is a better buy in the long-term than FULT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FFBC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FULT’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FFBC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FULT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both FFBC and FULT are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

FFBC (@Regional Banks) experienced а +10.74% price change this week, while FULT (@Regional Banks) price change was +9.21% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.41%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.86%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.34%.

Reported Earning Dates

FFBC is expected to report earnings on Apr 16, 2026.

FULT is expected to report earnings on Apr 21, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.41% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FULT($3.97B) has a higher market cap than FFBC($3.15B). FFBC has higher P/E ratio than FULT: FFBC (11.32) vs FULT (10.61). FFBC YTD gains are higher at: 20.384 vs. FULT (14.123). FULT has more cash in the bank: 307M vs. FFBC (210M). FFBC has less debt than FULT: FFBC (817M) vs FULT (1.47B). FULT has higher revenues than FFBC: FULT (1.3B) vs FFBC (885M).
FFBCFULTFFBC / FULT
Capitalization3.15B3.97B79%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD20.38414.123144%
P/E Ratio11.3210.61107%
Revenue885M1.3B68%
Total Cash210M307M68%
Total Debt817M1.47B56%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FFBC vs FULT: Fundamental Ratings
FFBC
FULT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
514
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
49
Fair valued
31
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3038
SMR RATING
1..100
1512
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4344
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5772
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7565

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FULT's Valuation (31) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FFBC (49). This means that FULT’s stock grew similarly to FFBC’s over the last 12 months.

FFBC's Profit vs Risk Rating (30) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FULT (38). This means that FFBC’s stock grew similarly to FULT’s over the last 12 months.

FULT's SMR Rating (12) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FFBC (15). This means that FULT’s stock grew similarly to FFBC’s over the last 12 months.

FFBC's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FULT (44). This means that FFBC’s stock grew similarly to FULT’s over the last 12 months.

FFBC's P/E Growth Rating (57) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FULT (72). This means that FFBC’s stock grew similarly to FULT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FFBCFULT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
40%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FFBC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FULT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
QRSIX45.940.50
+1.10%
FPA Queens Road Small Cap Value Instl
GSUKX24.370.17
+0.70%
Goldman Sachs International Eq Inc R6
KMVAX36.39-0.04
-0.11%
Kirr Marbach Partners Value
VWIGX36.19-0.38
-1.04%
Vanguard International Growth Inv
VALLX38.78-1.58
-3.91%
Value Line Larger Companies Focused Inv

FFBC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FFBC has been closely correlated with UBSI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 92% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FFBC jumps, then UBSI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FFBC
1D Price
Change %
FFBC100%
+2.24%
UBSI - FFBC
92%
Closely correlated
+1.66%
FNB - FFBC
91%
Closely correlated
+1.64%
COLB - FFBC
91%
Closely correlated
+2.30%
STBA - FFBC
91%
Closely correlated
+1.01%
TCBK - FFBC
90%
Closely correlated
+0.52%
More

FULT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FULT has been closely correlated with FNB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 94% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FULT jumps, then FNB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FULT
1D Price
Change %
FULT100%
+2.18%
FNB - FULT
94%
Closely correlated
+1.64%
WTFC - FULT
92%
Closely correlated
+1.14%
ONB - FULT
91%
Closely correlated
+1.02%
BY - FULT
91%
Closely correlated
+1.29%
FFBC - FULT
91%
Closely correlated
+2.24%
More