Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFAMX vs RLBFX
FFAMX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts FFAMX vs RLBFX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 50% A
Price$22.08
Change-$0.01 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.34B
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$38.43
Change-$0.07 (-0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets269.72B
FFAMX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFAMX vs. RLBFX commentary
Jan 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFAMX is a Hold and RLBFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 270B vs. FFAMX (10.3B). RLBFX (2.19) and FFAMX (2.10) have matching dividends . FFAMX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: FFAMX (19 years) vs RLBFX (24 years). FFAMX (0.85) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). RLBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. FFAMX (12.00). FFAMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBFX: FFAMX (0) vs RLBFX (250). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.57 vs. FFAMX (11.64). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 38.38 vs. FFAMX (16.23).
| FFAMX | RLBFX | FFAMX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 0.29 | 283% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.29 | 293% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.750 | 2.344 | 75% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.3B | 270B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.10 | 2.19 | 96% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.64 | 14.57 | 80% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.14 | 39.01 | 72% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.23 | 38.38 | 42% |
| Returns for 10 years | 64.63 | 92.91 | 70% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers