Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFAMX vs RLBFX
FFAMX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts FFAMX vs RLBFX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 50% A
Price$22.71
Change+$0.15 (+0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.97B
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$39.35
Change+$0.27 (+0.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets265.62B
FFAMX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFAMX vs. RLBFX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFAMX is a Hold and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 266B vs. FFAMX (9.97B). RLBFX (2.00) and FFAMX (1.95) have matching dividends . FFAMX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: FFAMX (19 years) vs RLBFX (23 years). FFAMX (0.83) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). RLBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. FFAMX (12.00). FFAMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBFX: FFAMX (0) vs RLBFX (250). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.71 vs. FFAMX (8.74). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 46.28 vs. FFAMX (25.98).
| FFAMX | RLBFX | FFAMX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 0.29 | 286% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 0.29 | 286% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.447 | 15.683 | 79% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.97B | 266B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.95 | 2.00 | 98% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.74 | 9.71 | 90% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.22 | 52.23 | 67% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.98 | 46.28 | 56% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.87 | 76.87 | 66% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement