Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFAMX vs RLBAX
FFAMX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts FFAMX vs RLBAX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 50% A
Price$21.74
Change+$0.06 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.63B
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$36.52
Change+$0.17 (+0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets252.39B
FFAMX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFAMX vs. RLBAX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFAMX is a StrongBuy and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 252B vs. FFAMX (9.63B). FFAMX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: FFAMX (2.00) vs RLBAX (1.18). FFAMX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: FFAMX (19 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). RLBAX (1.31) is less costly to investors than FFAMX (0.83). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. FFAMX (12.00). FFAMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBAX: FFAMX (0) vs RLBAX (250). FFAMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.06 vs. RLBAX (7.00). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 37.04 vs. FFAMX (26.58).
| FFAMX | RLBAX | FFAMX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 1.31 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 1.31 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.209 | 7.651 | 94% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.63B | 252B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.00 | 1.18 | 170% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.06 | 7.00 | 115% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.14 | 32.45 | 71% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.58 | 37.04 | 72% |
| Returns for 10 years | 42.00 | 58.01 | 72% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement