Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFAMX vs RLBAX
FFAMX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts FFAMX vs RLBAX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 50% A
Price$22.08
Change-$0.01 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.34B
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$37.96
Change-$0.07 (-0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets269.72B
FFAMX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFAMX vs. RLBAX commentary
Jan 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFAMX is a Hold and RLBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 270B vs. FFAMX (10.3B). FFAMX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: FFAMX (2.10) vs RLBAX (1.25). FFAMX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: FFAMX (19 years) vs RLBAX (24 years). RLBAX (1.31) is less costly to investors than FFAMX (0.85). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. FFAMX (12.00). FFAMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBAX: FFAMX (0) vs RLBAX (250). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.33 vs. FFAMX (11.64). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 32.37 vs. FFAMX (16.23).
| FFAMX | RLBAX | FFAMX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 1.31 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 1.31 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.750 | 2.290 | 76% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.3B | 270B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.10 | 1.25 | 168% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.64 | 13.33 | 87% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.14 | 34.62 | 81% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.23 | 32.37 | 50% |
| Returns for 10 years | 64.63 | 80.23 | 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers