Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFAMX vs RLBAX
FFAMX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts FFAMX vs RLBAX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 50% A
Price$22.01
Change-$0.02 (-0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.62B
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$37.06
Change-$0.08 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets256.26B
FFAMX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFAMX vs. RLBAX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFAMX is a StrongBuy and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 256B vs. FFAMX (9.62B). FFAMX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: FFAMX (2.04) vs RLBAX (1.17). FFAMX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: FFAMX (19 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). RLBAX (1.31) is less costly to investors than FFAMX (0.83). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. FFAMX (12.00). FFAMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBAX: FFAMX (0) vs RLBAX (250). FFAMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.51 vs. RLBAX (7.15). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.77 vs. FFAMX (24.11).
| FFAMX | RLBAX | FFAMX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 1.31 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 1.31 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.183 | 9.243 | 99% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.62B | 256B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.04 | 1.17 | 174% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.51 | 7.15 | 119% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.04 | 27.06 | 67% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.11 | 33.77 | 71% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.87 | 59.12 | 76% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers