Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFAMX vs RLBAX
FFAMX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts FFAMX vs RLBAX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 50% A
Price$22.20
Change+$0.06 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.76B
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$37.74
Change+$0.15 (+0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets259.11B
FFAMX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFAMX vs. RLBAX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFAMX is a StrongBuy and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 259B vs. FFAMX (9.76B). FFAMX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: FFAMX (2.00) vs RLBAX (1.15). FFAMX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: FFAMX (19 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). RLBAX (1.31) is less costly to investors than FFAMX (0.83). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. FFAMX (12.00). FFAMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBAX: FFAMX (0) vs RLBAX (250). RLBAX (9.12) and FFAMX (9.08) have marching annual gain over last year. RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 35.40 vs. FFAMX (24.48).
| FFAMX | RLBAX | FFAMX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 1.31 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 1.31 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.125 | 10.805 | 94% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.76B | 259B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.00 | 1.15 | 174% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.08 | 9.12 | 100% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.43 | 37.15 | 71% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.48 | 35.40 | 69% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.95 | 67.71 | 75% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement