Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFAFX vs ZVNBX
FFAFX vs ZVNBX Comparison
Open Charts FFAFX vs ZVNBX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F3
Price$84.20
Change+$0.28 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets328.1B
Zevenbergen Growth Investor
Price$42.25
Change+$0.38 (+0.91%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets146.51M
FFAFX vs ZVNBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 328B vs. ZVNBX (147M). FFAFX pays higher dividends than ZVNBX: FFAFX (0.58) vs ZVNBX (0.00). FFAFX was incepted earlier than ZVNBX: FFAFX (5 years) vs ZVNBX (10 years). ZVNBX (1.52) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.35). FFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. ZVNBX (13.62). FFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ZVNBX: FFAFX (250) vs ZVNBX (2500). ZVNBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 38.84 vs. FFAFX (18.10).
| FFAFX | ZVNBX | FFAFX / ZVNBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.30 | 27% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.52 | 23% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.477 | 11.684 | 115% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 328B | 147M | 223,129% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.58 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.10 | 38.84 | 47% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.41 | 119.71 | 50% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 39.16 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement