Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFAFX vs ZVNBX
FFAFX vs ZVNBX Comparison
Open Charts FFAFX vs ZVNBX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F3
Price$89.03
Change-$0.01 (-0.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.52B
Zevenbergen Growth Investor
Price$42.79
Change-$0.11 (-0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets134.71M
FFAFX vs ZVNBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 341B vs. ZVNBX (135M). FFAFX pays higher dividends than ZVNBX: FFAFX (0.53) vs ZVNBX (0.00). FFAFX was incepted earlier than ZVNBX: FFAFX (5 years) vs ZVNBX (10 years). ZVNBX (1.52) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.35). FFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. ZVNBX (15.24). FFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ZVNBX: FFAFX (250) vs ZVNBX (2500). ZVNBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.29 vs. FFAFX (9.20). FFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 43.09 vs. ZVNBX (17.07).
| FFAFX | ZVNBX | FFAFX / ZVNBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.30 | 27% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.52 | 23% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.987 | 13.111 | 152% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 341B | 135M | 252,593% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.53 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.20 | 11.29 | 81% |
| Returns for 3 years | 67.02 | 113.42 | 59% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.09 | 17.07 | 252% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 333.54 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement