Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFAFX vs ZVNBX
FFAFX vs ZVNBX Comparison
Open Charts FFAFX vs ZVNBX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F3
Price$81.08
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
Zevenbergen Growth Investor
Price$42.03
Change-$0.18 (-0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets132.34M
FFAFX vs ZVNBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. ZVNBX (132M). FFAFX pays higher dividends than ZVNBX: FFAFX (0.54) vs ZVNBX (0.00). FFAFX was incepted earlier than ZVNBX: FFAFX (5 years) vs ZVNBX (10 years). ZVNBX (1.46) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.34). FFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. ZVNBX (15.24). FFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ZVNBX: FFAFX (250) vs ZVNBX (2500). ZVNBX (6.32) and FFAFX (6.07) have marching annual gain over last year. FFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 24.65 vs. ZVNBX (-5.12).
| FFAFX | ZVNBX | FFAFX / ZVNBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.34 | 1.30 | 26% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.34 | 1.46 | 23% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.272 | 11.102 | 84% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 339B | 132M | 256,818% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.54 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.07 | 6.32 | 96% |
| Returns for 3 years | 67.88 | 150.63 | 45% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.65 | -5.12 | -481% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 310.05 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement