Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFAFX vs ZVNBX
FFAFX vs ZVNBX Comparison
Open Charts FFAFX vs ZVNBX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F3
Price$89.36
Change+$0.53 (+0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
Zevenbergen Growth Investor
Price$42.58
Change+$0.34 (+0.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets133.2M
FFAFX vs ZVNBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. ZVNBX (133M). FFAFX pays higher dividends than ZVNBX: FFAFX (0.54) vs ZVNBX (0.00). FFAFX was incepted earlier than ZVNBX: FFAFX (5 years) vs ZVNBX (10 years). ZVNBX (1.52) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.35). FFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. ZVNBX (15.24). FFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ZVNBX: FFAFX (250) vs ZVNBX (2500). FFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.34 vs. ZVNBX (5.00). FFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 34.69 vs. ZVNBX (3.54).
| FFAFX | ZVNBX | FFAFX / ZVNBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.30 | 27% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.52 | 23% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.205 | 10.547 | 182% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 339B | 133M | 254,887% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.54 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.34 | 5.00 | 147% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.71 | 108.47 | 59% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.69 | 3.54 | 980% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 306.81 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement