Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFAFX vs ZVNBX
FFAFX vs ZVNBX Comparison
Open Charts FFAFX vs ZVNBX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F3
Price$78.04
Change-$0.95 (-1.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets306.22B
Zevenbergen Growth Investor
Price$40.04
Change-$0.44 (-1.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets138.53M
FFAFX vs ZVNBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 306B vs. ZVNBX (139M). FFAFX pays higher dividends than ZVNBX: FFAFX (0.62) vs ZVNBX (0.00). FFAFX was incepted earlier than ZVNBX: FFAFX (5 years) vs ZVNBX (10 years). ZVNBX (1.52) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.35). FFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. ZVNBX (13.62). FFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ZVNBX: FFAFX (250) vs ZVNBX (2500). ZVNBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.25 vs. FFAFX (7.56).
| FFAFX | ZVNBX | FFAFX / ZVNBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.30 | 27% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.52 | 23% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.175 | 5.842 | 89% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 306B | 139M | 220,144% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.62 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.56 | 28.25 | 27% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.31 | 128.54 | 43% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 51.27 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement