Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFAFX vs WSACX
FFAFX vs WSACX Comparison
Open Charts FFAFX vs WSACX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F3
Price$82.60
Change+$0.81 (+0.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets322.86B
Wellington Shields All-Cap Instl
Price$29.36
Change+$0.30 (+1.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets61.85M
FFAFX vs WSACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 323B vs. WSACX (61.8M). FFAFX pays higher dividends than WSACX: FFAFX (0.58) vs WSACX (0.06). FFAFX was incepted earlier than WSACX: FFAFX (5 years) vs WSACX (30 years). WSACX (1.34) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.35). WSACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 45.77 vs. FFAFX (25.00). FFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WSACX: FFAFX (250) vs WSACX (5000). FFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.18 vs. WSACX (8.25).
| FFAFX | WSACX | FFAFX / WSACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.34 | 26% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.34 | 26% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.321 | 5.726 | 198% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 5000 | 5% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 323B | 61.8M | 522,654% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.58 | 0.06 | 919% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.18 | 8.25 | 136% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.65 | 25.64 | 240% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 32.66 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 24.96 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement