Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFAFX vs WSACX
FFAFX vs WSACX Comparison
Open Charts FFAFX vs WSACX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F3
Price$84.27
Change+$0.07 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets328.1B
Wellington Shields All-Cap Instl
Price$30.03
Change+$0.01 (+0.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets63.24M
FFAFX vs WSACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 328B vs. WSACX (63.2M). FFAFX pays higher dividends than WSACX: FFAFX (0.58) vs WSACX (0.06). FFAFX was incepted earlier than WSACX: FFAFX (5 years) vs WSACX (31 years). WSACX (1.34) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.35). WSACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 45.77 vs. FFAFX (25.00). FFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WSACX: FFAFX (250) vs WSACX (5000). FFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.96 vs. WSACX (12.21).
| FFAFX | WSACX | FFAFX / WSACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.34 | 26% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.34 | 26% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.571 | 8.138 | 167% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 5000 | 5% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 328B | 63.2M | 518,987% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.58 | 0.06 | 919% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.96 | 12.21 | 139% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.96 | 19.94 | 256% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 27.75 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 26.90 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement