Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFAFX vs WSACX
FFAFX vs WSACX Comparison
Open Charts FFAFX vs WSACX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F3
Price$87.08
Change-$1.95 (-2.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.4B
Wellington Shields All-Cap Instl
Price$32.27
Change-$1.03 (-3.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets67.6M
FFAFX vs WSACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. WSACX (67.6M). FFAFX pays higher dividends than WSACX: FFAFX (0.53) vs WSACX (0.06). FFAFX was incepted earlier than WSACX: FFAFX (5 years) vs WSACX (31 years). WSACX (1.34) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.35). WSACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 45.77 vs. FFAFX (25.00). FFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WSACX: FFAFX (250) vs WSACX (5000). WSACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.42 vs. FFAFX (9.20). FFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 43.09 vs. WSACX (34.97).
| FFAFX | WSACX | FFAFX / WSACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.34 | 26% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.34 | 26% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.987 | 19.914 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 5000 | 5% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 340B | 67.6M | 502,959% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.53 | 0.06 | 959% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.20 | 12.42 | 74% |
| Returns for 3 years | 67.02 | 37.90 | 177% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.09 | 34.97 | 123% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 47.88 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement