Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFAFX vs WLGYX
FFAFX vs WLGYX Comparison
Open Charts FFAFX vs WLGYX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F3
Price$89.03
Change-$0.01 (-0.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.52B
Macquarie Large Cap Growth Fund Y
Price$41.84
Change+$0.06 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.1B
FFAFX vs WLGYX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 341B vs. WLGYX (8.1B). FFAFX pays higher dividends than WLGYX: FFAFX (0.53) vs WLGYX (0.00). FFAFX was incepted earlier than WLGYX: FFAFX (5 years) vs WLGYX (25 years). WLGYX (0.97) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.35). FFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. WLGYX (18.00). WLGYX has a lower initial minimum investment than FFAFX: WLGYX (0) vs FFAFX (250). FFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.20 vs. WLGYX (6.41). FFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 43.09 vs. WLGYX (36.29).
| FFAFX | WLGYX | FFAFX / WLGYX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.89 | 39% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.97 | 36% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.987 | 10.221 | 196% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 341B | 8.1B | 4,212% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.53 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.20 | 6.41 | 144% |
| Returns for 3 years | 67.02 | 54.05 | 124% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.09 | 36.29 | 119% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 114.02 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers