Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFAFX vs WLGYX
FFAFX vs WLGYX Comparison
Open Charts FFAFX vs WLGYX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F3
Price$89.36
Change+$0.53 (+0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
Nomura Large Cap Growth Y
Price$38.07
Change-$2.97 (-7.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.87B
FFAFX vs WLGYX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. WLGYX (7.87B). FFAFX pays higher dividends than WLGYX: FFAFX (0.54) vs WLGYX (0.00). FFAFX was incepted earlier than WLGYX: FFAFX (5 years) vs WLGYX (25 years). WLGYX (0.97) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.35). FFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. WLGYX (18.00). WLGYX has a lower initial minimum investment than FFAFX: WLGYX (0) vs FFAFX (250). FFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.34 vs. WLGYX (4.40). FFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 34.69 vs. WLGYX (32.90).
| FFAFX | WLGYX | FFAFX / WLGYX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.89 | 39% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.97 | 36% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.205 | 8.114 | 237% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 339B | 7.87B | 4,308% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.54 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.34 | 4.40 | 167% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.71 | 65.82 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.69 | 32.90 | 105% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 102.47 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement