Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFAFX vs WLGYX
FFAFX vs WLGYX Comparison
Open Charts FFAFX vs WLGYX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F3
Price$87.71
Change+$0.18 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.91B
Macquarie Large Cap Growth Fund Y
Price$40.55
Change+$0.23 (+0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.85B
FFAFX vs WLGYX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 337B vs. WLGYX (7.85B). FFAFX pays higher dividends than WLGYX: FFAFX (0.55) vs WLGYX (0.00). FFAFX was incepted earlier than WLGYX: FFAFX (5 years) vs WLGYX (25 years). WLGYX (0.97) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.35). FFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. WLGYX (18.00). WLGYX has a lower initial minimum investment than FFAFX: WLGYX (0) vs FFAFX (250). FFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.90 vs. WLGYX (6.99).
| FFAFX | WLGYX | FFAFX / WLGYX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.89 | 39% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.97 | 36% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.208 | 6.823 | 267% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 337B | 7.85B | 4,292% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.55 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.90 | 6.99 | 170% |
| Returns for 3 years | 74.42 | 58.96 | 126% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 33.39 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 108.48 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement