Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFAFX vs WLGRX
FFAFX vs WLGRX Comparison
Open Charts FFAFX vs WLGRX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F3
Price$88.83
Change+$0.38 (+0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.05B
Nomura Large Cap Growth R
Price$32.94
Change-$2.98 (-8.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.87B
FFAFX vs WLGRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. WLGRX (7.87B). FFAFX pays higher dividends than WLGRX: FFAFX (0.54) vs WLGRX (0.00). FFAFX was incepted earlier than WLGRX: FFAFX (5 years) vs WLGRX (20 years). WLGRX (1.22) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.35). FFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. WLGRX (18.00). WLGRX has a lower initial minimum investment than FFAFX: WLGRX (0) vs FFAFX (250). FFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.34 vs. WLGRX (3.91). FFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 34.69 vs. WLGRX (27.11).
| FFAFX | WLGRX | FFAFX / WLGRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.14 | 31% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.22 | 29% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.205 | 7.900 | 243% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 340B | 7.87B | 4,321% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.54 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.34 | 3.91 | 188% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.71 | 63.64 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.69 | 27.11 | 128% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 85.54 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement