Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFAFX vs WLGCX
FFAFX vs WLGCX Comparison
Open Charts FFAFX vs WLGCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F3
Price$81.08
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
Nomura Large Cap Growth C
Price$23.47
Change+$0.06 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.83B
FFAFX vs WLGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. WLGCX (7.83B). FFAFX pays higher dividends than WLGCX: FFAFX (0.54) vs WLGCX (0.00). FFAFX was incepted earlier than WLGCX: FFAFX (5 years) vs WLGCX (26 years). WLGCX (1.72) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.34). FFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. WLGCX (18.00). FFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WLGCX: FFAFX (250) vs WLGCX (1000). FFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.07 vs. WLGCX (-5.86). FFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 24.65 vs. WLGCX (8.36).
| FFAFX | WLGCX | FFAFX / WLGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.34 | 1.64 | 21% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.34 | 1.72 | 20% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.272 | -3.495 | -265% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 339B | 7.83B | 4,331% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.54 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.07 | -5.86 | -104% |
| Returns for 3 years | 67.88 | 52.30 | 130% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.65 | 8.36 | 295% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 46.23 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement