Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFAFX vs WLGCX
FFAFX vs WLGCX Comparison
Open Charts FFAFX vs WLGCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F3
Price$87.08
Change-$1.95 (-2.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.4B
Macquarie Large Cap Growth Fund C
Price$26.19
Change-$0.45 (-1.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.93B
FFAFX vs WLGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. WLGCX (7.93B). FFAFX pays higher dividends than WLGCX: FFAFX (0.53) vs WLGCX (0.00). FFAFX was incepted earlier than WLGCX: FFAFX (5 years) vs WLGCX (25 years). WLGCX (1.72) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.35). FFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. WLGCX (18.00). FFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WLGCX: FFAFX (250) vs WLGCX (1000). FFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.20 vs. WLGCX (4.72). FFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 43.09 vs. WLGCX (15.93).
| FFAFX | WLGCX | FFAFX / WLGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.64 | 21% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.72 | 20% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.987 | 9.539 | 210% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 340B | 7.93B | 4,286% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.53 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.20 | 4.72 | 195% |
| Returns for 3 years | 67.02 | 39.77 | 169% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.09 | 15.93 | 271% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 59.71 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers