Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFAFX vs WLGCX
FFAFX vs WLGCX Comparison
Open Charts FFAFX vs WLGCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F3
Price$79.38
Change-$9.63 (-10.82%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.97B
Nomura Large Cap Growth C
Price$21.79
Change-$4.57 (-17.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.21B
FFAFX vs WLGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. WLGCX (7.21B). FFAFX pays higher dividends than WLGCX: FFAFX (0.48) vs WLGCX (0.00). FFAFX was incepted earlier than WLGCX: FFAFX (5 years) vs WLGCX (26 years). WLGCX (1.72) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.34). FFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. WLGCX (18.00). FFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WLGCX: FFAFX (250) vs WLGCX (1000). FFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.01 vs. WLGCX (-10.84). FFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 15.47 vs. WLGCX (-2.20).
| FFAFX | WLGCX | FFAFX / WLGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.34 | 1.64 | 21% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.34 | 1.72 | 20% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.985 | -6.078 | 16% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 336B | 7.21B | 4,659% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.48 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.01 | -10.84 | -28% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.16 | 27.80 | 166% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.47 | -2.20 | -704% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 56.76 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers